Re: bounced posts go to spam

2018-07-31 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 16:52, Sonic wrote: > > Apparently, mail.example.org and ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com enforce DMARC > > in different ways. > > > > Regardless, if the DMARC policy does not authorize host Y to send > > mail on behalf of domain $myorigin, then you need to fix the DMARC > > policy so

Re: bounced posts go to spam

2018-07-31 Thread Sonic
> Apparently, mail.example.org and ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com enforce DMARC > in different ways. > > Regardless, if the DMARC policy does not authorize host Y to send > mail on behalf of domain $myorigin, then you need to fix the DMARC > policy so that those bounces sent by host Y aren't violating DMARC,

Re: bounced posts go to spam

2018-07-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Sonic: > > Try setting > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > > internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce > > > > (this assumes that you have configured "non_smtpd_milters" to invoke > > the DKIM signer). > > > >> It also appears to come from a sub-domain, the HELO name, and not just > >> the SLD (in

Re: bounced posts go to spam

2018-07-31 Thread Sonic
> Try setting > > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce > > (this assumes that you have configured "non_smtpd_milters" to invoke > the DKIM signer). > >> It also appears to come from a sub-domain, the HELO name, and not just >> the SLD (in this particular case) which

Re: please help, getting desperate

2018-07-31 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Jul 31, 2018, at 7:21 AM, Andras Kemeny wrote: > > my virtual users are in LDAP, but they have their own UID and GID. since i > don't want to do a setuid script for the LDA (and obviously the LDA needs to > run with the correct permissions to be able to affect the target user's >

Re: please help, getting desperate

2018-07-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Andras Kemeny: > hi, > > i have a question regarding the pipe, when being used to contact the LDA > (in my case, dovecot). Why not use Dovecot's LMTP support? Wietse

Re: bounced posts go to spam

2018-07-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Sonic: > > does your simple relay reject the mail, does your server reject the mail > > when receiving from the relay, or do remote servers reject the mail from > > your simple relay? > > The remote servers reject, or place in spam, bounced and NDR's from > the relay, due to a strict DMARC

Re: bounced posts go to spam

2018-07-31 Thread Sonic
> does your simple relay reject the mail, does your server reject the mail > when receiving from the relay, or do remote servers reject the mail from > your simple relay? The remote servers reject, or place in spam, bounced and NDR's from the relay, due to a strict DMARC policy. > Note that

R: R: Rewrite header From:

2018-07-31 Thread Scappatura Rocco
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] Per conto di Noel Jones > Inviato: lunedì 30 luglio 2018 20:15 > A: postfix-users@postfix.org > Oggetto: Re: R: Rewrite header From: > > On 7/30/2018 8:19 AM, Scappatura Rocco

please help, getting desperate

2018-07-31 Thread Andras Kemeny
hi, i have a question regarding the pipe, when being used to contact the LDA (in my case, dovecot). my virtual users are in LDAP, but they have their own UID and GID. since i don't want to do a setuid script for the LDA (and obviously the LDA needs to run with the correct permissions to be

Re: bounced posts go to spam

2018-07-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 30.07.18 15:22, Sonic wrote: I have a simple relay for sending emails from internal scanners and a voicemail system. All works fine except for posts that get bounced as the bounce notifications somehow fail both SPF and DKIM tests. please provide more info about the mail flow. does your