Hi
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Without a Postfix instance around, just 'echo' a message to the milter
> > listener?
>
> If you still want to go down this path, OpenDKIM has a miltertest component
> to
> drive it's test suite without an MTA present. I have not
On Friday, November 02, 2018 10:23:04 AM pg...@dev-mail.net wrote:
> I'm starting to work on writing my own outbound milter for a Postfix
> instance.
>
> While working on it, I'll want to test with message submissions "to" it.
>
> Is there a good example of manually submitting a robust -- i.e.,
> > Without a Postfix instance around, just 'echo' a message to the
> > milter listener?
>
> Nope. Milters speak a binary protocol. You can't just echo an email
> message into it.
>
> I think it would be easier to implement your tests with SMTP, using
> XCLIENT to impersonate any IP address,
pg...@dev-mail.net:
> I'm starting to work on writing my own outbound milter for a Postfix instance.
>
> While working on it, I'll want to test with message submissions "to" it.
Use Postfix XCLIENT to impersonate any client IP address.
http://www.postfix.org/XCLIENT_README.html
You can use a
I'm starting to work on writing my own outbound milter for a Postfix instance.
While working on it, I'll want to test with message submissions "to" it.
Is there a good example of manually submitting a robust -- i.e., exactly as
from a running, Postfix instance -- message example to a milter?
Alice Wonder:
> I'm just looking for something for those who refuse to embrace DNSSEC
> that at the same time doesn't discourage the use of DNSSEC.
The DNSSEC workarounds keep coming: a recent example is DNS over
HTTPS, a.k.a. DoH. It's off-topic for this list. though.
Wietse
> On Nov 2, 2018, at 1:37 AM, James Brown wrote:
>
> make -f Makefile.init makefiles CCARGS='-DUSE_TLS -DUSE_SASL_AUTH \
> -DDEF_SERVER_SASL_TYPE=\"dovecot\" \
> -DDEF_COMMAND_DIR=\"/usr/local/sbin\" \
> -DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=\"/usr/local/etc/postfix\" \
>
