> =On Jun 7, 2019, at 2:22 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> Mail comes in. If it passes postscreen then when it is delivered to the user
> a BCC is generated by rbcc.pcre which delivers to the backup account and for
> inexplicable reasons, a DSN is generated for that BCC to root (which is
> aliased to o
On Jun 6, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Jun 6, 2019, at 5:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>>
>>> This is unequivocal evidence of use of "sendmail -bv". You're reporting
>>> non-use of "sendmail -v", but "-bv" != "-v". Perhaps you have a content
>>> filter that is misconfigured to use "s
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019, 08:05 Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> > On Jun 6, 2019, at 6:48 AM, Günther J. Niederwimmer
> wrote:
> >
> > Now I like to create a secondary postfix for my system.
> >
> > What are the best to realize, have this two servers in sync?
> >
> > I have enable postscreen, all I found
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 6:48 AM, Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote:
>
> Now I like to create a secondary postfix for my system.
>
> What are the best to realize, have this two servers in sync?
>
> I have enable postscreen, all I found on Internet, is to have installed
> memcache is this correct?
>
@lbutlr:
> mail postfix/pipe[78386]: 45FZmb6nfgzdrvL:
> to=>, relay=dovecot,
> delay=0.03, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=deliverable
> (delivers to command: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda)
That is logged after invoking 'sendmail -bv, or after requesting
address verification.
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 5:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> This is unequivocal evidence of use of "sendmail -bv". You're reporting
>> non-use of "sendmail -v", but "-bv" != "-v". Perhaps you have a content
>> filter that is misconfigured to use "sendmail -bv".
>
> As I have said twice now, there is no
On Jun 6, 2019, at 12:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> This is unequivocal evidence of use of "sendmail -bv". You're reporting
> non-use of "sendmail -v", but "-bv" != "-v". Perhaps you have a content
> filter that is misconfigured to use "sendmail -bv".
As I have said twice now, there is no ins
Thanks for the heads-up, I for one found it useful by virtue of Exim4
being the default MTA in Debian installations.
On 06/06/2019 20:05, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[ Largely off-topic here, but perhaps some readers will benefit. ]
If, in addition to any Postfix systems you may have, you also have
Hi nameless
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 12:15:10PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> On May 31, 2019, at 1:52 AM, Bastian Blank
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:29:11AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> >> mail postfix/pipe[78386]: 45FZmb6nfgzdrvL:
> >> to=>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.03,
> >> delays=0.01/0.01/0/
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 2:15 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:29:11AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>>> mail postfix/pipe[78386]: 45FZmb6nfgzdrvL:
>>> to=>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.03,
>>> delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=deliverable (delivers to
>>> command: /usr/local/libexec
On May 31, 2019, at 1:52 AM, Bastian Blank
wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:29:11AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>> mail postfix/pipe[78386]: 45FZmb6nfgzdrvL:
>> to=>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.03,
>> delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=deliverable (delivers to command:
>> /usr/local/libexec/d
[ Largely off-topic here, but perhaps some readers will benefit. ]
If, in addition to any Postfix systems you may have, you also have
some Exim systems, please make sure to upgrade them to 4.92 promptly:
Qualys Security Advisory
The Return of the WIZard: RCE in Exim (CVE-2019-10149)
Hello,
postfix 3.4.5
i mean i have a correct running postfix server. ;-)
Now I like to create a secondary postfix for my system.
What are the best to realize, have this two servers in sync?
I have enable postscreen, all I found on Internet, is to have installed
memcache is this correct?
But
13 matches
Mail list logo
