> On Oct 2, 2019, at 6:34 PM, Christian Göttsche wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am getting several warning a day of the form
>
>postfix/smtpd[6969]: warning: hostname domain does not resolve to address
> ip
>postfix/smtpd[10614]: warning: hostname domain does not resolve to
> address ip: Name or
Hi,
I am getting several warning a day of the form
postfix/smtpd[6969]: warning: hostname domain does not resolve to address ip
postfix/smtpd[10614]: warning: hostname domain does not resolve to
address ip: Name or service not known
My question is, why are these logged with syslog priorit
Hi, not sure if this helps but, these are the networks that my postfix server
is setup to send email to O365 so users get their mail delivered
# Microsoft Networks
23.103.132.0/22
23.103.136.0/21
23.103.144.0/20
23.103.198.0/23
23.103.200.0/22
23.103.212.0/22
40.92.0.0/14
40.107.0.0/17
40.10
On 2019/10/02 16:13, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:50:23PM +0200, ratatouille wrote:
> > Henrik K schrieb am 02.10.19 um 15:46:18 Uhr:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:20:48PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I got rid of it, since of too many false positive
Dnia 2.10.2019 o godz. 11:05:31 ratatouille pisze:
>
> Do I really have to whitelist all the IPs of outbound.protection.outlook.com
> in postgrey?
I just put the domain name outbound.protection.outlook.com into
/etc/postgrey/whitelist_clients.local and it works for me.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw
* ratatouille :
> Hello!
>
> Do I really have to whitelist all the IPs of outbound.protection.outlook.com
> in postgrey?
Yes. There's a script for that:
# Postwhite - Automatic Postcreen Whitelist / Blacklist Generator #
# https://github.com/stevejenkins/postwhite #
# By S
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:50:23PM +0200, ratatouille wrote:
> Henrik K schrieb am 02.10.19 um 15:46:18 Uhr:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:20:48PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > >
> > > I got rid of it, since of too many false positives related to outlook,
> > > gmail
> > > etc.
>
Henrik K schrieb am 02.10.19 um 15:46:18 Uhr:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:20:48PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> > I got rid of it, since of too many false positives related to outlook, gmail
> > etc.
>
> Why would you greylist something that's easily skipped using DNSWL etc?
Tha
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:20:48PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> I got rid of it, since of too many false positives related to outlook, gmail
> etc.
Why would you greylist something that's easily skipped using DNSWL etc?
On 2019-10-02 ratatouille wrote:
> Do I really have to whitelist all the IPs of
> outbound.protection.outlook.com in postgrey?
Ansgar Wiechers schrieb am 02.10.19 um 11:56:56 Uhr:
No. You could simply stop graylisting and instead use spam protection
measures without its side effects (e.g. pos
Ansgar Wiechers schrieb am 02.10.19 um 11:56:56 Uhr:
> On 2019-10-02 ratatouille wrote:
> > Do I really have to whitelist all the IPs of
> > outbound.protection.outlook.com in postgrey?
>
> No. You could simply stop graylisting and instead use spam protection
> measures without its side effect
On 2019-10-02 ratatouille wrote:
> Do I really have to whitelist all the IPs of
> outbound.protection.outlook.com in postgrey?
No. You could simply stop graylisting and instead use spam protection
measures without its side effects (e.g. postscreen).
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Abstractions save
Hello!
Do I really have to whitelist all the IPs of outbound.protection.outlook.com in
postgrey?
Oct 2 10:57:28 bitclusive1 postfix/smtpd[20061]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail-eopbgr680083.outbound.protection.outlook.com[40.107.68.83]: 450 4.2.0
: Recipient address rejected: Greylisted for
Thanks Peter for the detailed information.
Given that I run this mail server just for my family and in light of
your advice, I probably don't need the backup.
Thanks,
Leo
On 23/9/19 5:49 pm, Peter wrote:
On 23/09/19 1:24 PM, subscription1 wrote:
I've been running my own Postfix (Dovecot, My
On 2019-09-29, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> The only thing I can't do is I cannot completely avoid
> forwarding mail to Gmail accounts, because there are some addresses on my
> server that need to be kept as forwarding addresses after people moved to
> Gmail; but as I see from serve
15 matches
Mail list logo
