On 13 Jan 2020, at 07:58, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> You were forced to use ports 587 or 465 for outgoing mail.
Yes, that is a sensible ISP.
--
And she was lying in the grass And she could hear the highway
breathing And she could see a nearby factory She's making sure
she is not d
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 06:25:27PM +0100, Simon B wrote:
> > > >> >Since upgrading to 2.11 yesterday (yes, I am on a path to move up
> > > >> >through debian versions), all mail coming in on
> > > >> >postfix/submission/smtpd is being rejected by the domain check in that
> > > >> >file, even thoug
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 18:22, Simon B wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 15:53, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> wrote:
> >
> > >> On 10.01.20 12:42, Simon B wrote:
> > >> >For as long as I can I remember, I have blocked connections purporting
> > >> >to be my own domain/IP address using a postmapped fil
Dnia 13.01.2020 o godz. 15:50:59 Gerben Wierda pisze:
> Some ISP’s even go further my catching all traffic to port 25 to any
> system outsuide their network (other than to their own MTAs) blocking it
> or directing that to their own MTA. That is because of course one hacked
> system in their networ
Some ISP’s even go further my catching all traffic to port 25 to any system
outsuide their network (other than to their own MTAs) blocking it or directing
that to their own MTA. That is because of course one hacked system in their
network means an open relay from their network and that is bad fo
