Re: PATCH: Glibc-2.31 DNSSEC and GCC 10

2020-04-27 Thread Rich Felker
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:16:01PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 08:02:41PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > On 19.04.20 13:11, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > >Warning: libc-musl breaks DANE/TLSA security. > > >Use a glibc-based Linux distribution instead. > >

Re: Gmail and spam, a request

2020-04-27 Thread pgndev
https://dmarc.org/2017/03/can-i-use-dmarc-if-i-have-only-deployed-spf/ "... you can use DMARC with only SPF – and absolutely should, at least as far as enabling reporting – ..." On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 3:55 PM Ralph Seichter wrote: > * pe...@pajamian.dhs.org: > > > DKIM is not required for

Re: Gmail and spam, a request

2020-04-27 Thread Ralph Seichter
* pe...@pajamian.dhs.org: > DKIM is not required for DMARC. Now you're just being ridiculous, and have earned yourself a membership in my killfile. "DMARC [...] builds on the widely deployed SPF and DKIM protocols" (https://dmarc.org "What is DMARC?"). -Ralph

Re: header_checks question

2020-04-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Juan Manuel P: > Hello Witse do you mean to use HOLD action on header_checks ? > > like this ? > > /^Subject:.*hacked*/ HOLD By the way that "*" at the end is useless. > And that whats suppose to do ? > > It is holded the email on the queue ? and I can check with mailq command ? > and later

Re: header_checks question

2020-04-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 27.04.20 13:27, Juan Manuel P wrote: Hello Witse do you mean to use HOLD action on header_checks ? like this ? /^Subject:.*hacked*/ HOLD And that whats suppose to do ? if Wietse's message wasn't enough for you, I recommend looking at http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html It is

Re: header_checks question

2020-04-27 Thread Juan Manuel P
Hello Witse do you mean to use HOLD action on header_checks ? like this ? /^Subject:.*hacked*/ HOLD And that whats suppose to do ? It is holded the email on the queue ? and I can check with mailq command ? and later detele from queue and email me a alert Sorry for ask and not try, because we

Re: header_checks question

2020-04-27 Thread Wietse Venema
jmpatagonia: > Hello I need help to using header_checks, I create a rule > > /^Subject:.*hacked*/ DISCARD An alternative is to use HOLD action, assuming you aren't using software that hijacks the HOLD feature for other purposes, such as mailscanner. Then you can review the email with "postcat

header_checks question

2020-04-27 Thread jmpatagonia
Hello I need help to using header_checks, I create a rule /^Subject:.*hacked*/ DISCARD that work propertly, but a want to know it is posible to email me o to alert me when this rule occur or is aplicated. For some way. Oviusly I see that on the mail.log regards -- Sent from:

Re: Gmail and spam, a request

2020-04-27 Thread Richard Damon
On 4/26/20 11:47 PM, Peter wrote: > On 27/04/20 2:02 am, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 4/26/20 8:15 AM, Peter wrote: >>> On 27/04/20 12:00 am, Richard Damon wrote: Except that if the sender is sending from a domain with an email policy that effectively says, "This domain is intended to

Re: Avoid mail loop

2020-04-27 Thread ego...@gmail.com
FYI it was a Microsoft O365 configuration issue, indeed. In our hybrid environment (O365 + Postfix) a routing configuration that is commonly enabled in O365 (called "inbound connector") generated that loop. After a few weeks of mail exchanges with Microsoft support they gave us the solution. If