On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 09:49:50AM +, Linkcheck wrote:
> /trap this|/
> /|trap this/
> /trap||this/
>
> Is there a Lint tool that can check for this or be adapted easily? Or
> perhaps a different method?
You can stage the PCRE tables from intended source tables to target
tables via "make" r
On 03 Feb 2021, at 10:02, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Feb 3, 2021, at 2:34 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>>> However, in my role as an admin, you just gave me excellent
>>> justification to never run Postfix.
>> If you think that is a reason to not run Postfix then you can't run SMTP at
>> all.
>>
>> Y
On 2/2/21 12:39 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:54:18PM +, Antonio Leding
> wrote:
>>You're not doin' well son...quit diggin' and go back to rethink your
>>approach. I dare say at least a majority on this list, including
>>myself, will trus
On 3 Feb 2021, at 4:49, Linkcheck wrote:
I'm normally careful about this matter but it has happened twice in a
couple of months now due, I admit, to my own carelessness but dumping
a lot of mail before the error was noticed.
The specific problem is with extra or multiple OR bars in pcre check
On 2/3/2021 3:49 AM, Linkcheck wrote:
I'm normally careful about this matter but it has happened twice in
a couple of months now due, I admit, to my own carelessness but
dumping a lot of mail before the error was noticed.
The specific problem is with extra or multiple OR bars in pcre
checks
> On Feb 3, 2021, at 2:34 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> However, in my role as an admin, you just gave me excellent
>> justification to never run Postfix.
>
> If you think that is a reason to not run Postfix then you can't run SMTP at
> all.
>
> You do not get to redefine standards just on your whim
On 02 Feb 2021, at 08:27, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> However, in my role as an admin, you just gave me excellent
> justification to never run Postfix.
If you think that is a reason to not run Postfix then you can't run SMTP at all.
You do not get to redefine standards just on your whim.
--
Competen
Anton Rieger:
> Hi there,
>
> is it possible to bind a service in master.cf to a IPv6 Link-Local address?
>
> I tried using following syntaxes:
> [fe80::216:3eff:fe0d:9aa8%eth0]:smtp
> [fe80::216:3eff:fe0d:9aa8%13]:smtp
> [fe80:c:216:3eff:fe0d:9aa8]:smtp # BSD Non standard style
>
Tried your link.
tried the process I am told the are not blocking my ip
They say forward message which i did and it gets bounced
tried contacting postmas...@earthlink.net. and get bounced
fun
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 2:33 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>
> On 2/2/2021 12:09 PM, Jason Hirsh wrote:
Hi there,
is it possible to bind a service in master.cf to a IPv6 Link-Local address?
I tried using following syntaxes:
[fe80::216:3eff:fe0d:9aa8%eth0]:smtp
[fe80::216:3eff:fe0d:9aa8%13]:smtp
[fe80:c:216:3eff:fe0d:9aa8]:smtp # BSD Non standard style
[fe80::216:3eff:fe0d:9aa8]:smt
I'm normally careful about this matter but it has happened twice in a
couple of months now due, I admit, to my own carelessness but dumping a
lot of mail before the error was noticed.
The specific problem is with extra or multiple OR bars in pcre checks.
For example:
/trap this|/
/|trap this
11 matches
Mail list logo
