On 2021-06-10 12:02 a.m., post...@ptld.com wrote:
On 06-09-2021 11:45 pm, Apelin, Eulogio wrote:
They all come back with 502. 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized
I just tested it again using "ehlo myserver.com" in both upper and lower
case and both work. You have not shown any settings but i
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 02:59:02AM +, Apelin, Eulogio wrote:
> I am testing my mail server setup, when telnetting to port 25, I receive this
> interaction when I type 'helo myserver.com'
>
> 220 ***
This banner typicall results
Hi!
On 2021-06-09 10:59 p.m., Apelin, Eulogio wrote:
>
> The client that gets the 220 response with ** in the
> banner, is connecting like this:
Those stars remind me of that (crappy) Cisco Pix SMTP protocol fixup.
This does disable ESTMP commands like EHLO but I am surprise
On 06-09-2021 11:45 pm, Apelin, Eulogio wrote:
All these commands do not work:
ehlo
helo
HELO
EHLO
HELO myserver.com
EHLO myserver.com
They all come back with 502. 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized
I just tested it again using "ehlo myserver.com" in both upper and lower
case and both work. Y
All these commands do not work:
ehlo
helo
HELO
EHLO
HELO myserver.com
EHLO myserver.com
They all come back with 502. 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of post...@ptld.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 5:36 PM
To: postf
On 06-09-2021 10:59 pm, Apelin, Eulogio wrote:
I am testing my mail server setup, when telnetting to port 25, I
receive this interaction when I type 'helo myserver.com'
220 ***
helo myserver.com
502 5.5.2 Error: command not recog
I am testing my mail server setup, when telnetting to port 25, I receive this
interaction when I type 'helo myserver.com'
220 ***
helo myserver.com
502 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized
Connection to host lost.
1. The client
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:06:52PM -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
> Another idea, is it possible to have postfix not use the virtual user table
> / not rewrite the email address if the mail is being relayed? That would
> allow mailjet to just send the email back and have it get delivered
> normally.
Thanks for the advice! I'll need to wrap my head around this...
Another idea, is it possible to have postfix not use the virtual user table
/ not rewrite the email address if the mail is being relayed? That would
allow mailjet to just send the email back and have it get delivered
normally.
On Wed
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 07:20:43PM -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
> I have check_recipient_mx_access setup to route mail for certain providers
> through a relay. This has been working well, until I discovered it is
> breaking delivery to local users that get CC'd in an email that is being
> routed th
Hi all,
I have check_recipient_mx_access setup to route mail for certain providers
through a relay. This has been working well, until I discovered it is
breaking delivery to local users that get CC'd in an email that is being
routed through this relay.
Here is how I have it setup:
smtpd_recipien
Thanks Wietse
El 8/6/2021 a les 15:18, Wietse Venema ha escrit:
> Francesc Pe?alvez:
>> The question may have been answered, but I don't see it. Is there a way
>> to change the 4xx error from postscreen to error 5xx so that it doesn't
>> retry to send the mail blocked by dnsbl
> There is no '4xx'
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4g0fnm4hyszj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> Ciao from Germany to the big Apple!
|> (Or maybe .. peanuts?? Or Sunflower seeds? :)
|
|All of the above? I haven't been in the city for more than a year,
Oh .. yes. And potatoes! Potatoes are good.
|bu
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Ciao from Germany to the big Apple!
> (Or maybe .. peanuts?? Or Sunflower seeds? :)
All of the above? I haven't been in the city for more than a year,
but things are very slowly returning to normal in the Northeast US
with vaccination levels around 70 percent.
Wietse
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4g0bbj3dlnzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|>|Then Postfix sends a delivery status notification.
|...
|>|Again, Postfix opens the mailbox file, does an lseek() to the end
|>|of the file, writes the message, flushes the output with fsync(),
|>|and closes
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> |Then Postfix sends a delivery status notification.
...
> |Again, Postfix opens the mailbox file, does an lseek() to the end
> |of the file, writes the message, flushes the output with fsync(),
> |and closes the mailbox file before claiming successful delivery.
> |
> |As f
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20210609165007.rc_ih%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
||> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/smtpd[17007]: B713116056: client=unknown[45.13\
||> 7\
||> .22.84]
| ...
||> status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
||
||Postfix delivers an email message with message-id
||<2021060816
Hello.
That was fast, thanks.
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4g0wjn1gdwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/smtpd[17007]: B713116056: client=unknown[45.137\
|> .22.84]
...
|> status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
|
|Postfix delivers an email message with m
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 11:48:45AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Jun 9 01:38:07 postfix/local[17012]: B713116056:
> > to=, relay=local, delay=2.1, delays=1.3/0.01/0/0.83,
> > dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
>
> Postfix opens the mailbox file, does an lseek() to the end of the
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/smtpd[17007]: B713116056:
> client=unknown[45.137.22.84]
> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/cleanup[17011]: B713116056:
> message-id=<20210608163805.e242f6fe5d7ac...@sdaoden.eu>
> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/qmgr[2581]: B713116056: from=,
> size=2828, nrcpt=1
Hello.
For a month or so i struggle with occasional such reports, as
below. The log of the last is like
Jun 9 01:38:05 postfix/smtpd[17007]: warning: hostname
hosted-by.rootlayer.net does not resolve to address 45.137.22.84
Jun 9 01:38:05 postfix/smtpd[17007]: connect from unknown[45.137.
I am trying to rebuild a very old and very neglected set of mail servers.
The basic design has a mail relay (MTA) “out front” for incoming traffic (SMTP,
I think)
If the incoming message gets past amazes, spam assassin and clamp, it is then
sent to another server “behind the front lines” that i
post...@ptld.com:
> I changed "silent_discard" to "silent-discard" in main.cf and it stopped
> logging the CHUNKING messages.
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = chunking, silent-discard
Updated the documentation (on the upstream mirror).
Wietse
23 matches
Mail list logo
