On 2022-04-14 08:39, Erwan David wrote:
I stopped rspamd because of too many false positive, too many rules
that you cannot disable (I disabled RBL & SPF checks which lead to
erros).
rspamd is for pilots only, that know ucl is much more simple then well
supported xml files, with plenty of sup
Le 14/04/2022 à 07:58, Aban Dokht a écrit :
P V Anthony wrote:
Rspamd is really powerful and fast.
Give it a go. You will be very pleased.
P.V.Anthony
I also prefer rspamd over other solutions, because it implemets DMARC
out of the box.
Also other features, like ARC, HA ready and the nice
P V Anthony wrote:
Rspamd is really powerful and fast.
Give it a go. You will be very pleased.
P.V.Anthony
I also prefer rspamd over other solutions, because it implemets DMARC out of
the box.
Also other features, like ARC, HA ready and the nice UI make it worth to give
it a try.
Regar
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 01:22:03AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:25:11AM -0400, Greg Klanderman wrote:
>
> > > This is naturally documented in access(5), and also in postconf(5)
> > > under:
> > >
> > > smtpd_null_access_lookup_key (default: <>)
> > >The
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:25:11AM -0400, Greg Klanderman wrote:
> > This is naturally documented in access(5), and also in postconf(5)
> > under:
> >
> > smtpd_null_access_lookup_key (default: <>)
> >The lookup key to be used in SMTP access(5) tables instead of the
> >null sen
On 14/4/2022 8:18 am, raf wrote:
I too like rspamd.
I've read that it was not maintained, someone took over it ?
Jeff
I think you read wrong. The original author put out a release 5 days ago.
And there were 8 new contributors for that release.
The release before that was last November.
chee
> On April 10, 2022 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 02:27:33PM -0400, Greg Klanderman wrote:
>> Quick question, what is the correct syntax to match an empty sender in
>> a hash: sender access map (i.e. check_sender_access)?
> This is naturally documented in access(5), and al
> On April 13, 2022 Matus UHLAR <- fantomas > wrote:
>>> On April 10, 2022 Bill Cole
>>> wrote:
>>> Right, because you do not need to run 'postmap' on regex or pcre maps. The
>>> text
>>> format ios what Postfix uses for those types.
> On 12.04.22 23:06, Greg Klanderman wrote:
>> T
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 02:11:55AM +0200, Jean-François Bachelet
wrote:
> Hello ^^)
>
> Le 13/04/2022 à 17:28, P V Anthony a écrit :
> > On 13/4/2022 3:24 pm, Juri Haberland wrote:
> >
> > > There is rspamd. It does more than just DMARC, but seems to be in better
> > > shape than OpenDMARC.
>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:04:59PM -0400, John Levine wrote:
> >in other words if a domain is nullMx postfix still reject it, aswell for
> >senders
>
> Not all MTAs work the same.
Not even Postfix :-)
By default mail is accepted from NullMX envelope sender domains, to
reject it one must elect
It appears that Benny Pedersen said:
gmail.dk. 300 IN MX 0 .
>>>
>>> if nullMX is added then spf and dmarc can be removed
>>
>> You need both the null MX and the SPF. Null MX says you
>> don't receive mail, SPF -all says you don't send mail.
>
>why is spf needed
On 2022-04-14 02:40, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Benny Pedersen said:
On 2022-04-13 19:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
however, they miss the nullmx record:
gmail.dk. 300 IN MX 0 .
if nullMX is added then spf and dmarc can be removed
You need both the
It appears that Benny Pedersen said:
>On 2022-04-13 19:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> however, they miss the nullmx record:
>>
>> gmail.dk. 300 IN MX 0 .
>
>if nullMX is added then spf and dmarc can be removed
You need both the null MX and the SPF. Null MX sa
Hello ^^)
Le 13/04/2022 à 17:28, P V Anthony a écrit :
On 13/4/2022 3:24 pm, Juri Haberland wrote:
There is rspamd. It does more than just DMARC, but seems to be in better
shape than OpenDMARC.
I too like rspamd.
I've read that it was not maintained, someone took over it ?
Jeff
On 2022-04-13 19:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
however, they miss the nullmx record:
gmail.dk. 300 IN MX 0 .
if nullMX is added then spf and dmarc can be removed
i have localy added nullMX to bind9 here for gmail.dk
posttls -l dane plantmarknaden.com
one mor
On 2022-04-13 18:46, Wietse Venema wrote:
Benny Pedersen:
i recently begin to see domains give connection timeout
posttls-finger -l none gmail.dk
According to my DNS, gmail.dk has no MX record. Is that expected?
On 13.04.22 19:01, Benny Pedersen wrote:
in what way its not a nullMX domain
On 2022-04-13 18:46, Wietse Venema wrote:
Benny Pedersen:
i recently begin to see domains give connection timeout
posttls-finger -l none gmail.dk
According to my DNS, gmail.dk has no MX record. Is that expected?
in what way its not a nullMX domain ?
postfix deliver mail to A/ aswell i
Benny Pedersen:
>
> i recently begin to see domains give connection timeout
>
> posttls-finger -l none gmail.dk
According to my DNS, gmail.dk has no MX record. Is that expected?
Wietse
i recently begin to see domains give connection timeout
posttls-finger -l none gmail.dk
i use -l none here in case it was just openssl problem, in gentoo last
openssl is compiled without weak-ssl-ciphers
postfix version 3.6.5 with default smtp_* for ciphers
is others see same problems ?
On 13/4/2022 3:24 pm, Juri Haberland wrote:
There is rspamd. It does more than just DMARC, but seems to be in better
shape than OpenDMARC.
I too like rspamd.
P.V.Anthony
On 13/04/2022 13:29, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
I use amavisd-new for the smtpd instances that receive authenticated
submission.
Are there any significant pros and cons in doing this as a pre-queue
filter (proxy) compared to doing it as a post-queue content filter?
I suspect that it doesn't really ma
> There is rspamd. It does more than just DMARC, but seems to be in better
> shape than OpenDMARC.
I use OpenDMARC and have not noticed any issues.
More than one person has said it has issues, what are the problems with it?
On 13/04/2022 13:29, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
I use amavisd-new for the smtpd instances that receive authenticated
submission.
Are there any significant pros and cons in doing this as a pre-queue
filter (proxy) compared to doing it as a post-queue content filter?
I suspect that it doesn't really ma
On 2022-04-13 15:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jesper Dybdal:
I use amavisd-new for the smtpd instances that receive authenticated
submission.
Are there any significant pros and cons in doing this as a pre-queue
filter (proxy) compared to doing it as a post-queue content filter?
Doing what as a fil
Jesper Dybdal:
> I use amavisd-new for the smtpd instances that receive authenticated
> submission.
>
> Are there any significant pros and cons in doing this as a pre-queue
> filter (proxy) compared to doing it as a post-queue content filter?
Doing what as a filter?
Pro is that you have the o
I use amavisd-new for the smtpd instances that receive authenticated
submission.
Are there any significant pros and cons in doing this as a pre-queue
filter (proxy) compared to doing it as a post-queue content filter?
I suspect that it doesn't really matter for a low-volume server like
mine,
On April 10, 2022 Bill Cole wrote:
Right, because you do not need to run 'postmap' on regex or pcre maps. The text
format ios what Postfix uses for those types.
On 12.04.22 23:06, Greg Klanderman wrote:
Thank you Bill! Knowing that now, I see where postmap(1) states:
| The postmap(1) comman
On 4/12/22 11:31 PM, John Levine wrote:
For doing DMARC validation, I know about the opendmarc milter. Is that what
everyone uses? Is there anything else used in pratice?
for inbound validation, i use
https://github.com/fastmail/authentication_milter
usable as milter or smtp filter
integ
On 13/04/2022 05:31, John Levine wrote:
> For doing DMARC validation, I know about the opendmarc milter. Is that what
> everyone uses? Is there anything else used in pratice?
>
> I know about perl and python libraries but they don't seem to have
> milters or other ready to use integrations into
Am 13.04.22 um 10:26 schrieb Damian:
https://mail.sys4.de/mailman/listinfo/dane-users does not work?
thanks, that information was missing.
Gruß,
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe tryi
Am Mittwoch, April 13, 2022 10:22 CEST, schrieb Matthias Fechner
:
> Am 12.04.2022 um 19:15 schrieb Ralph Seichter:
> > I'm happy to usedane-us...@sys4.de if you don't mind it. I consider
> > that one pretty much*your* mailing list and did not mean to just barge
> > in, although I had obviously
how can I sub-scr1be to this list?
Sorry to write it this way, but there is a stupid filter in place that
blocks the email.
https://mail.sys4.de/mailman/listinfo/dane-users does not work?
Am 12.04.2022 um 19:15 schrieb Ralph Seichter:
I'm happy to usedane-us...@sys4.de if you don't mind it. I consider
that one pretty much*your* mailing list and did not mean to just barge
in, although I had obviously hoped for your input in particular.
how can I sub-scr1be to this list?
Sorry t
33 matches
Mail list logo
