> On Jan 2, 2023, at 4:20 PM, raf wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 08:32:42PM +, "Cooper, Robert A"
> wrote:
>
>> I have a request from my downstream Exchange admins to look into
>> implementing ARC sealing in some postfix relay servers we use for
>> address rewriting. From the bit o
Tuesday, January 3, 2023, 2:47:45 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 07:32:51PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > I was just curious what might cause that string of question marks.
>>
>> This is what a Postfix string looks like after its memory is freed.
>> Something to look a
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 07:32:51PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I was just curious what might cause that string of question marks.
>
> This is what a Postfix string looks like after its memory is freed.
> Something to look at in the train tomorrow.
Simple patch, the cache dictionary name is
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 01:21:07PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > Assuming that these finite fields are different than the finite
> > fields that elliptic curve cryptography is based on, the proposed
> > parameter structure seems sensble to me.
>
> Yes, indeed the underlying coefficient finite
Phil Biggs:
> Hello and happy new year to all,
>
> My friend is currently running FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p2 GENERIC with the
> postfix-sasl-3.7.2_1,1 pkg.
>
> Today I noticed this in his log:
>
> 2023-01-02T20:07:39.385545+11:00 postfix.[redacted] postfix/verify 23191 - -
> cache ???
On 1/2/23 15:32, Cooper, Robert A wrote:
> I have a request from my downstream Exchange admins to look into implementing
> ARC sealing in some postfix relay servers we use for address rewriting. From
> the bit of research I've done, it looks like this would require being
> implemented in an ex
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 08:32:42PM +, "Cooper, Robert A"
wrote:
> I have a request from my downstream Exchange admins to look into
> implementing ARC sealing in some postfix relay servers we use for
> address rewriting. From the bit of research I've done, it looks like
> this would require
Hello and happy new year to all,
My friend is currently running FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p2 GENERIC with the
postfix-sasl-3.7.2_1,1 pkg.
Today I noticed this in his log:
2023-01-02T20:07:39.385545+11:00 postfix.[redacted] postfix/verify 23191 - -
cache ??? partial c
Cooper, Robert A skrev den 2023-01-02 21:32:
I have a request from my downstream Exchange admins to look into
implementing ARC sealing in some postfix relay servers we use for
address rewriting. From the bit of research I've done, it looks like
this would require being implemented in an externa
On 1/2/23 15:32, Cooper, Robert A wrote:
I have a request from my downstream Exchange admins to look into
implementing ARC sealing in some postfix relay servers we use for
address rewriting. From the bit of research I've done, it looks like
this would require being implemented in an external
I have a request from my downstream Exchange admins to look into implementing
ARC sealing in some postfix relay servers we use for address rewriting. From
the bit of research I've done, it looks like this would require being
implemented in an external milter. I had not even heard of ARC befor
Le 02/01/2023 à 20:38, Laurent Frigault a écrit :
Hi,
Is there any way to have some smtpd_access_maps with
parent_domain_matches_subdomains and some other without it ?
I have :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_unknown_sender_domain
On 1/2/2023 1:38 PM, Laurent Frigault wrote:
Is there any way to have some smtpd_access_maps with
parent_domain_matches_subdomains and some other without it ?
I have :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_unknown_sender_domain
reje
Laurent Frigault:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to have some smtpd_access_maps with
> parent_domain_matches_subdomains and some other without it ?
There currently is no syntax to force some lookups with and some
without.
However, parent_domain_matches_subdomains does not apply to pcre:,
regexp:, tc
Hi,
Is there any way to have some smtpd_access_maps with
parent_domain_matches_subdomains and some other without it ?
I have :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_unknown_sender_domain
reject_unauth_destination
check_sender_access
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 12:57:05PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > But doing this in a backwards-compatible way, that still works for any
> > users who were brave enough to set "tls_eecdh_auto_curves" expecting
> > to just limit the EC groups, means that we'll need two parameters with
> > the belo
Viktor Dukhovni:
> [ The devel list majordomo is not doing too well just now, so please
> pardon my use of postfix-users instead. ]
>
> In TLS 1.3 the key exchange parameters, whether elliptic curve (ECDHE or
> ECX, where ECX is one of X25519 or X448) or finite-field (FFDHE), are always
> from a
[ The devel list majordomo is not doing too well just now, so please
pardon my use of postfix-users instead. ]
In TLS 1.3 the key exchange parameters, whether elliptic curve (ECDHE or
ECX, where ECX is one of X25519 or X448) or finite-field (FFDHE), are always
from a negotiated list of well-know
Hello,
After checks I noticed that I had "1.1.1.1" in my resolv.conf. And that
this DNS was specified in my dhcpcd.conf (certainly a mistake on my side).
I deleted this entry in dhcpcd.conf and restarted the service. And no
more "1.1.1.1" in resolv.conf.
I tested to send an email from anoth
19 matches
Mail list logo
