[pfx] Re: Need some help with postsrsd

2023-05-30 Thread Shimon Weinreich (Gmail) via Postfix-users
Tnx alot!! On Tue, May 30, 2023, 18:20 Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: > On 30.05.23 06:51, Shimon Weinreich (Gmail) via Postfix-users wrote: > >I need some help. I defined posrsrsd with postfix and all is working. I > >mean, while sending an e-mail

[pfx] Re: Need some help with postsrsd

2023-05-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 30.05.23 06:51, Shimon Weinreich (Gmail) via Postfix-users wrote: I need some help. I defined posrsrsd with postfix and all is working. I mean, while sending an e-mail it changes the 'from' like this: SRS0=imkW=BT=yahoo.com=shimo...@openu.ac.il did it change header From: too? But when I

[pfx] Re: MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Emmanuel Fusté via Postfix-users
Le 30/05/2023 à 16:07, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users a écrit : Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-30 14:30: There's no good reason to have mail sent to mx2 unless mx1 is down. and subject says load balancing, not backup mx imho OP asked not to have mx backup, but load

[pfx] Re: MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 04:07:32PM +0200, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: > > There's no good reason to have mail sent to mx2 unless mx1 is down. Under the proviso that "mx1" is the mail store. The mail has to go there anyway, so it may as well get there in one hop. "Load balancing"

[pfx] Re: MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-30 14:30: There's no good reason to have mail sent to mx2 unless mx1 is down. and subject says load balancing, not backup mx imho OP asked not to have mx backup, but load balancing, in with case HA-Proxy would help more also if load

[pfx] Re: MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 08:20:20PM +0800, t...@dkinbox.com wrote: > > In other words, where is the mail ultimately delivered for users to > > read it? > > I have a primary mx server saying it's mx1.dkinbox.com, where mails are > stored. In that case, "load-balancing" makes no sense. You should

[pfx] Re: MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Reed via Postfix-users
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 07:18:01PM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users > wrote: > >> If I set up backup MX just the same weight as primary MX, can the two MX >> servers work as load balancer for incoming emails? > > Will both then relay the mail to some other server for mailbox storage? > Or

[pfx] Re: MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 07:18:01PM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote: > If I set up backup MX just the same weight as primary MX, can the two MX > servers work as load balancer for incoming emails? Will both then relay the mail to some other server for mailbox storage? Or are mailboxes

[pfx] Re: MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Reed via Postfix-users
> Tom Reed via Postfix-users: >> >> Hello >> >> If I set up backup MX just the same weight as primary MX, can the two MX >> servers work as load balancer for incoming emails? > > The backup MX will need a transport map to route mail to the primary MX. > See: > >

[pfx] Re: MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Tom Reed via Postfix-users: > > Hello > > If I set up backup MX just the same weight as primary MX, can the two MX > servers work as load balancer for incoming emails? The backup MX will need a transport map to route mail to the primary MX. See:

[pfx] MX load balancing

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Reed via Postfix-users
Hello If I set up backup MX just the same weight as primary MX, can the two MX servers work as load balancer for incoming emails? Thank you. -- Sent from https://dkinbox.com/ ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To