[pfx] Re: WTF X-ANONYMOUSTLS ???

2023-12-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 06:45:27AM +0100, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote: > * Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > > > Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service [...] > > Gee, who woulda thunk? ;-) That being said, perhaps somebody on the > "mailop" mailing list would be able to offer more insight?

[pfx] Re: WTF X-ANONYMOUSTLS ???

2023-12-26 Thread Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
* Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service [...] Gee, who woulda thunk? ;-) That being said, perhaps somebody on the "mailop" mailing list would be able to offer more insight? Some exotic extension, perhaps, or a weird application level firewall? I sure hope it is not a

[pfx] Re: The log is overflowed with same error message "end-of-input while reading request from tlsmgr socket: Application error"

2023-12-26 Thread Dmitry Katsubo via Postfix-users
On 2023-12-25 16:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > Dmitry Katsubo via Postfix-users: >> Dear Postfix team, >> >> In some rare cases when OS is CPU-loaded, the log is overflowed with the >> following messages from Postfix, which fills up log space very quickly: >> >> 2023-12-24

[pfx] WTF X-ANONYMOUSTLS ???

2023-12-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
I can't imagine what went on in the minds of the developers who thought it necessary to implement an "X-ANONYMOUSTLS" ESMTP extension. What's wrong with STARTTLS, that this was felt to be needed? Does anyone known where this might be, at least in part, documented? I've just run into a domain

[pfx] Re: 25 years today

2023-12-26 Thread Christos Chatzaras via Postfix-users
> On 26 Dec 2023, at 20:30, Bob Proulx via Postfix-users > wrote: > > Wietse Venema wrote: >> As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the >> "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. > > Thank you for Postfix and thank you all of the years of working on it! > I

[pfx] Re: 25 years today

2023-12-26 Thread Bob Proulx via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema wrote: > As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the > "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. Thank you for Postfix and thank you all of the years of working on it! I can't imagine running a mail server using any other software. Postfix is not just

[pfx] Re: SMTP Smuggling and filters

2023-12-26 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Pedro David Marco: > To my understanding, the Smuggled email contains SMTP data plus > headers, plus body... , so what is the problem if filters check > them as well? Wietse: > The problem is that Postfix receives TWO messages. > https://www.postfix.org/smtp-smuggling.html#impact Pedro David

[pfx] Re: SMTP Smuggling and filters

2023-12-26 Thread Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users
Thanks Wietse, yes it is clear in your doc, but both messages go through filter?? despite what the MAIL FROM is? Thanks, Pedro. On Tuesday, December 26, 2023 at 03:34:34 PM GMT+1, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users: > To my understanding, the

[pfx] Re: SMTP Smuggling and filters

2023-12-26 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users: > To my understanding, the Smuggled email contains SMTP data plus > headers, plus body... , so what is the problem if filters check > them as well? The problem is that Postfix receives TWO messages. https://www.postfix.org/smtp-smuggling.html#impact

[pfx] SMTP Smuggling and filters

2023-12-26 Thread Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users
Hi all, after reading the documention from Viktor and Wietse about this issue, there is still something i do not have clear enough... Please excuse me! How does Postfix behave with the smuggled email? i mean... what happens with Milters and after-queue filters?  To my understanding, the