On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:35:39PM +0100, Simon Hoffmann via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > DO NOT use the deprecated "virtual_domains" parameter, it mixes
> > classification of domains with address mappings.
>
> I have read that and I thought I understood it.
Simply put, use "virtual_alias_domains"
Dnia 21.01.2024 o godz. 23:35:39 Simon Hoffmann via Postfix-users pisze:
> I have also read http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html and this
> states that with virtual alias mode i can have the same local part in an
> email address and deliver them to different unix users, but i can still
> use
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 07:21:26PM +0100, Simon Hoffmann via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > The old virtual_domains file just lists all domains (one per line), and can
> > directly be used in
> > virtual_alias_domains.
>
> You're going about this the
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 07:21:26PM +0100, Simon Hoffmann via Postfix-users
wrote:
> The old virtual_domains file just lists all domains (one per line), and can
> directly be used in
> virtual_alias_domains.
You're going about this the wrong way, by tryign to translate low-level
artefacts from
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:53:58PM +0100, Simon Hoffmann via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > This copies only the message headers and body, but fails to capture the
> > message envelope, which contains the true recipient list. With
> > per-recipient addressing in "recipient_bcc_maps", and provided the
Hey all,
I found a second topic where I am not sure how postfix behaves.
The old virtual_domains file just lists all domains (one per line), and can
directly be used in
virtual_alias_domains.
However, in my virtual aliases table on OpenSMTPd, I have the following
line-types
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > - You may want to "preserve the envelope", by generating a
> > > recipient-specific bcc address. Just "always_bcc" fails
> > > to record "bcc" recipients, and may record header recipients
> > > who weren't actually (envelope) recipients of the
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 09:39:06AM +0100, Paul Menzel via Postfix-users wrote:
> pg.de is currently a parked domain, so our users will not going to
> email there, and I would like to reject such messages submitted to us,
> that the email client shows an error as it’s done, when, for example,
>
Dear Postfix users,
The Max Planck Society consists of several institutes/organizations each
running their own email infrastructure (which is good, as it’s
decentralized. Most of them have the a subdomain under mpg.de, and
sometimes we notice users from our institute sending emails to
