On 2024-08-10 at 19:48:18 UTC-0400 (Sun, 11 Aug 2024 01:48:18 +0200)
christian via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Am 10.08.2024 um 22:14 schrieb Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
This is caused by a misconfiguration of the account or the entire
domain in MS365. It can only be fixed on the M
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 at 16:16, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> The dnsblog(8) service is NOT postscreen(8) and does not know which
> values postscreen(8) might, or might not, take into account. It just
> logs what it fines. It is up to postscreen(8) to ma
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Gilgongo via Postfix-users wrote:
> I have the following in my postscreen_dnsbl_sites:
>
> wl.mailspike.net=127.0.0.[19;20]*-2
>
> Yet my logs show entries for .17 and .18 as well, eg:
>
> Aug 11 14:14:10 alice postfix/dnsblog[3952116]: addr 211.15
I have the following in my postscreen_dnsbl_sites:
wl.mailspike.net=127.0.0.[19;20]*-2
Yet my logs show entries for .17 and .18 as well, eg:
Aug 11 14:14:10 alice postfix/dnsblog[3952116]: addr 211.151.30.122 listed
by domain wl.mailspike.net as 127.0.0.17
Aug 11 14:14:59 alice postfix/dnsb
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 01:33:30PM +0200, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Laura Smith via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-08-11 10:29:
>
> > Why doesn't dovecot_destination_recipient_limit get a mention in the
> > postconf docs (https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html)
>
> you have added
Laura Smith via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-08-11 10:29:
Why doesn't dovecot_destination_recipient_limit get a mention in the
postconf docs (https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html)
I discovered I needed it today because of an obscure error in my logs
affecting only certain mails.
Those mai
We have no way to help you on this. The reason is only known by MS itself.
If I was you, I will check the following stuff on my end,
1. sender IP reputation (listed in any RBL?)
2. sender IP reverse DNS and hostname
3. sender IP action (any bulk sending?)
4. helo hostname
5. message body (any sen
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 08:29:22AM +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
> Why doesn't dovecot_destination_recipient_limit get a mention in the
> postconf docs (https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html)
Because the parameter is synthesised, based on the presence of a
transport named "dovecot
Why doesn't dovecot_destination_recipient_limit get a mention in the postconf
docs (https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html)
I discovered I needed it today because of an obscure error in my logs affecting
only certain mails.
Those mails worked again after dovecot_destination_recipient_limit=1
