Re: got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-09 Thread Christopher J. Ruwe
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 18:07:59 -0400 (EDT) Wietse Venema wrote: > Christopher J. Ruwe: > > Jul 8 22:09:28 mail postfix/local[1999]: 144761410: > > to=, relay=local, delay=0.97, > > delays=0.54/0.03/0/0.4, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (unknown user: > > "test") >

Re: got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-09 Thread Christopher J. Ruwe
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:16:19 -0500 Noel Jones wrote: > On 7/8/2012 4:18 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > On 7/8/2012 3:20 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: > > > >> Jul 8 22:09:28 mail postfix/local[1999]: 144761410: > >> to=, relay=local, delay=0.97, > >>

Re: got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-08 Thread Christopher J. Ruwe
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 09:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Wietse Venema wrote: > Christopher J. Ruwe: > > I am currently fighting against a postfix-dovecot installation, > > wich I have taken from another functional server and adapted IPs > > and names. The new installation is behaving d

got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-08 Thread Christopher J. Ruwe
libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x8012a3000) -- end of postfinger output -- If anybody can offer a hint on why I get a local delivery where I want a virtual delivery via dovecot, I'd be really grateful. Cheers, -- Christopher J. Ruwe TZ: GMT + 2h signature.asc Description: PGP signature