Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 04:03:44 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Jan Kohnert skrev den 2013-06-15 03:58:
Well, no, it disables AUTH without tls/ssl but not STARTTLS, IIRC.
starttls have nothing to do with auth or not
Come on, read the documentation:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 03:45:02 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Nabil Alsharif skrev den 2013-06-15 02:59:
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
this disable starttls since we already is using ssl/tls now
huh? This part I don't quite understand. How are we disabling TLS?
Where was it enabled
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2013, 20:06:48 schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
Postfix 2.10 on Gentoo adds the safety net, but the package manager
won't automatically clobber files under /etc. You're supposed to run a
tool (etc-update) afterwards to merge any changes. I'm guessing that's
what got
Hi folks,
I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some issues
with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl and according
to the logs auth works fine, but however postfix thinks I do not want to
relay stuff from authenticated users anymore...
Here's the log
Hi there again,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013, 01:08:09 schrieb Jan Kohnert:
I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some issues
with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl and according
to the logs auth works fine, but however postfix thinks I do not want
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 18:24:23 schrieb /dev/rob0:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:08:09AM +0200, Jan Kohnert wrote:
I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some
issues with relaying authenticated users. I'm using dovecot sasl
and according to the logs auth works fine
Hi again,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013, 01:34:13 schrieb Jan Kohnert:
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 18:24:23 schrieb /dev/rob0:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:08:09AM +0200, Jan Kohnert wrote:
I have recently upgraded to 2.10.0 (gentoo) and now having some
issues with relaying authenticated users
Rachid Abdelkhalak schrieb:
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain
mynetworks = 10.78.0.0/16, 10.82.0.0/19, 127.0.0.0/32
relay_domains = $mydestination, $mydomain
relayhost = [192.168.10.2]
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
This is entirely inappropriate and unnecessary.
Well, I must admit, I got heated up a bit in this discussion, and should have
rethinked my words more before posting.
Sorry about that, and my apologies to Moe.
--
MfG Jan
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:36:52PM +0200, Moe wrote:
My point is: When 'myhostname' and 'mydomainname' are left out of
main.cf then postfix makes an attempt to auto-detect them.
These are MTA configuration variables.
And there would also be the fix in Postfix (if
Stan Hoeppner schrieb:
Jan Kohnert put forth on 6/3/2010 5:55 PM:
Or let the Debian people write that patch for their version, as their
users are apparently the only ones who comlain and such a fix could
probably mess up more postfix-experienced users... ;)
Please don't paint the Debian
BABEDH-DHRA schrieb:
mail:~# ls -al /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
srw-rw 1 postfix postfix 0 2010-05-16 11:33
/var/spool/postfix/private/auth
That looks sane, too.
I am not sure about your second question.
Especially Cisco-systems are known to mess up SMTP Traffic, so is there a
Hi,
Jannis Achstetter schrieb:
An email (FROM is not in $mydestination) from an unauthenticated user to
an address in $mydestination is accecpted. This is also fine.
An email from an unauthenticated user to any destination but
$mydestination (open relay) is denied. Perfect.
BUT: Any email
Mikael Bak schrieb:
Submission on port 587 implies STARTTLS (I think).
Well, only if you configure it that way. (OK, it *really* makes sense to
encrypt transfer, if you do authentication...)
But:
jan...@kohni ~ $ telnet smtp.web.de 587
Trying 217.72.192.157...
Connected to smtp.web.de.
Escape
14 matches
Mail list logo
