On May 8, 2012, at 14:34, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * James Seymour :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm using the SPF policy daemon. Works great (or appears to, anyway),
>> save one thing: The rejects claim "Recipient address rejected," when,
>> in reality, it's the sender's address that's being rejected. T
On May 7, 2012, at 15:52, Fiona Hines wrote:
> I understand now what you are referring to but you were assuming that I was
> using STARTTLS, which was my mistake for not mentioning it. I'm not using
> STARTTLS. The connection is encrypted from the beginning of the transaction.
> STARTTLS was
