Re: PCRE on Received Header

2017-11-09 Thread Michael B Allen
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > I don't know what you mean by "protocol correct" re trace information. > In any case, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.4 states: The RFC states that Received headers must be inserted and that they

Re: PCRE on Received Header

2017-11-08 Thread Michael B Allen
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Ralph Seichter <m16+post...@monksofcool.net> wrote: > On 08.11.17 23:45, Michael B Allen wrote: > >> many folks are apparently removing this header entirely. That seems >> sloppy to me but if you think otherwise, please tell me about it

PCRE on Received Header

2017-11-08 Thread Michael B Allen
Hi, I would like to re-write the Received header on some messages being sent using ESMTPSA through my mail server. Specifically the header I would like to re-write currently looks like the following (names have been changed to protect the guilty): " Received: from workstation.busihome.local

Re: Very Basic SPF Record

2015-06-09 Thread Michael B Allen
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Peter uncle_p...@fastmail.com wrote: Hi Mike, ~all denotes soft fail. In other words that means that if you forget to add an IP address of your new server to SPF it is not going to be a total failure :) Soft fail allows to undertake other steps in case it

Re: Very Basic SPF Record

2015-06-08 Thread Michael B Allen
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:42 AM, DTNX Postmaster postmas...@dtnx.net wrote: On 09 Jun 2015, at 05:20, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote: I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and mail.busicorp.com. My

Very Basic SPF Record

2015-06-08 Thread Michael B Allen
I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and mail.busicorp.com. My understanding is the following is probably what I want: v=spf1 mx ~all Would you agree? Mike

454 Relay access denied

2015-06-06 Thread Michael B Allen
I just moved over to my new server and I can't receive mail. I can send mail and do IMAP stuff authenticated. I just cannot receive mail. The server is just a single all-in-one smtpd / submission / imap server for a handful of users. I just copied my old config pretty much verbatim but I must

Re: 454 Relay access denied

2015-06-06 Thread Michael B Allen
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote: Jun 6 23:21:06 www postfix/smtpd[2228]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail-la0-f44.google.com[209.85.215.44]: 454 4.7.1 jsm...@busicorp.com: Relay access denied; from=jo...@gmail.com to=jsm...@busicorp.com proto=ESMTP helo

General SPAM Strategy

2015-06-04 Thread Michael B Allen
Hi, I need a better spam setup. Right now I'm using spamd to mark spam and then procmail to put spam in Maildir/.Spam and then run bayes on Maildir/.LearnAsSpam once in a while manually and then I have to delete stuff once in a while manually and so on and so on ad nausium. Can someone give me

Re: Disabling SSLv2 does not work as expected

2011-09-05 Thread Michael B Allen
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 9/2/2011 2:17 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: My objectives are not driven by or based on logic. They are based on the requirements of a consortium of credit card companies and banks. Do they require you to offer STARTTLS

Re: Disabling SSLv2 does not work as expected

2011-09-05 Thread Michael B Allen
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 9/5/2011 10:50 AM, Michael B Allen wrote: On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 9/2/2011 2:17 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: My objectives are not driven by or based on logic

Re: Disabling SSLv2 does not work as expected

2011-09-05 Thread Michael B Allen
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 9/5/2011 11:19 AM, Michael B Allen wrote: On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: Or separate your mail and https servers to different IP addresses so it's not the same server

Disabling SSLv2 does not work as expected

2011-09-02 Thread Michael B Allen
Hello, I am using postfix 2.3 on CentOS and I would like to disable SSLv2. If I do the following: smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = SSLv3, TLSv1 smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium, high but despite the fact that this configuration has been posted and reposted about the WWW, it does not actually

Re: Disabling SSLv2 does not work as expected

2011-09-02 Thread Michael B Allen
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Michael B Allen: Hello, I am using postfix 2.3 on CentOS and I would like to disable SSLv2. If I do the following: smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = SSLv3, TLSv1 smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium, high

Re: Disabling SSLv2 does not work as expected

2011-09-02 Thread Michael B Allen
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Michael B Allen: On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Michael B Allen: Hello, I am using postfix 2.3 on CentOS and I would like to disable SSLv2. If I do the following

Re: Re-write Received Header to Exclude Home Dynamic IP?

2011-05-01 Thread Michael B Allen
@fc58] ~ host pool-98-190-153-84.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net    Host pool-98-190-153-84.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) I changed the IP for the purpose of posting to a public forum. -- Michael B Allen Java Active Directory Integration http://www.ioplex.com/

Re-write Received Header to Exclude Home Dynamic IP?

2011-04-27 Thread Michael B Allen
Hi, When I send email from home through my Postfix server my home dynamic IP is included in the Received header: Received: from nano.foo.net (pool-98-190-153-84.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [98.190.153.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate