-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 22:31 +0530, Akshay Pushparaj via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I would like to know if i can configure postfix to forward mails if
> user not found in local recipient table.
>
> Usecase:
>
> Users are split between LDAP in my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2024-02-13 at 18:32 +0100, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:23:32 -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-
> users wrote:
> > - masquerade_domains complicates table-driven address validation.
> > Log a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 07:52 -0500, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
> I used an access list to redirect all email from them to a spam
> folder.
Elegant solution, of this I approve.
> Turns out I was asked to block the emails users had
With
> > > firewall
> > > rules there's not sufficient forensic evidence left behind.
>
> On 14.02.24 19:11, Nikolai Lusan via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Here's a tip - try the 'LOG' target before you DROP/DENY/REJECT (I
> > prefer REJECT with an ICMP host/port u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 10:51 -0500, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On 2/7/24 10:41, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Good info.
> >
> > This site sends nothing but junk. IN fact the domain is known for
> > it.
> > I tried just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 12:15 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:21:10AM -0500, John Hill via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > I use fail2ban as well. I'm just going to see if the sender sever
> > will give
> >
