What is the output of:
zfs get quota,reservation data/cloud/server/ROOT/zbe
-Remy
>> On 1 Jun 2020, at 11:16, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
>
> Hi Jaco, thanks a lot. Here is the output:
>
> Sonicle XStreamOS (powered by illumos) SunOS 5.11 xs_154 June 2016
> sonicle@cloudserver:~$ zpool list
> N
Marko,
> i see alot of entries from postfix/dnsblog in my logs like this:
>
> postfix/dnsblog[30381]: warning: dnsblog_query: lookup error for DNS query
> 140.99.145.217.xx.zen.dq.spamhaus.net: Host or domain name not
> found. Name service error for
> name=140.99.145.217.xx
I am running a Debian Lenny machine with Postfix 2.5.5 and Dovecot 2.0.8.
Up until now I ran Postfix with the Procmail delivery agent succesfully.
The machine has only local users; I am not using virtual mailboxes. Due to
obvious reasons I want to switch to Dovecot LDA delivery, through LMTP.
On 06.03.2011 19:25 , Wietse Venema wrote:
Nikolaos Milas:
I'm asking trying to learn:
Is there a benefit of using LMTP for local delivery when using Dovecot?
Why not use Dovecot LDA (without using LMTP)?
Better scalability, performance, and error handling than is possible
with the pipe-to-com
On 06.03.2011 17:21 , Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 03/06/2011 04:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Remy Zandwijk:
Is there a way Postfix can be told to get rid of the domain part if mail is
sent through LMTP?
No. The LMTP protocol, like SMTP requires complete email addresses.
Wietse
Additionally
I am running a Debian Lenny machine with Postfix 2.5.5 and Dovecot 2.0.8. Up
until now I ran Postfix with the Procmail delivery agent succesfully. The
machine has only local users; I am not using virtual mailboxes. Due to
obvious reasons I want to switch to Dovecot LDA delivery, through LMTP.
Hi list,
I am running a Debian Lenny machine with Postfix 2.5.5 and Dovecot 2.0.8. Up
until now I ran Postfix with the Procmail delivery agent succesfully. The
machine has only local users; I am not using virtual mailboxes. Due to obvious
reasons I want to switch to Dovecot LDA delivery, throu