Hello
On desktop I always use Thunderbird for MUA.
Thunderbird is clean and lite, handling protocol well.
But for mobile (I primarily use iOS), I couldn't find a good MUA to use.
I tried almost every release on appStore (outlook, edison, bluemail,
spark, mymail...), they are either too compli
Hello
Following this guide:
https://useplaintext.email/
Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
Thanks
Nice work on the release. Thanks Wietse.
Mar 17, 2020, 21:39 by emaw...@gmail.com:
> Hello! excellent work, the option to bounce emails manually is very useful
> for me.
>
> Never perform the update through the source code. I would like to know if I
> can get the src.rpm for Centos?
>
>
>
> El
this mail sending feature?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:06 PM Mauricio Tavares
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:40 PM Wesley Peng wrote:
> >
> > How to compile postfix into the Embedded operating system (such as the
> home router) and make it as a mail gateway for Sma
How to compile postfix into the Embedded operating system (such as the
home router) and make it as a mail gateway for Smart home appliances?
Thank you.
Hello
My ISP email even doesn’t require SMTP AUTH. Will they be acting as open
relay? How to stop abuse of outgoing mail?
Regards
Hi
I have a question needing your help.
I have a few domains, every domain has a contact email.
How to configure postfix to accept every domain and every email on domain, and
deliver them to a specific mailbox?
I meant, I don’t want to add the virtual domain one by one in postfix, but like
t
Hi Wietse
on 2019/11/27 23:38, Wietse Venema wrote:
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.4.8.html]
Fixed in Postfix 3.4:
It's really nice to see postfix gets continuous development for these
many years. Wish it becomes m
Thanks.
While I am still not clear about what the description in mxtoolbox.
Can you give more details?
regards.
on 2019/11/27 16:08, patpro wrote:
On 2019-11-27 08:15, Wesley Peng wrote:
Hello
I saw myrambler.ru has a special setting for SPF:
myrambler.ru. 3599 IN TXT
Hello
I saw myrambler.ru has a special setting for SPF:
myrambler.ru. 3599IN TXT "v=spf1
ip4:81.19.78.96/27 ip4:81.19.78.0/27 ip4:81.19.88.0/24
-exists:%{ir}.spf.rambler.ru ~all"
what does it mean for this part:
-exists:%{ir}.spf.rambler.ru
Thank you.
Hello
on 2019/11/27 12:20, Richard Damon wrote:
DMARC/SPF, which only validates to the From: header will break.
If the sender domain set up SPF to:
v=spf1 ip4:0.0.0.0/0 ~all
Will this pass through any SPF check?
regards.
on 2019/11/27 10:00, 황병희 wrote:
Personally i read public mailing lists' messages by Gmane. There is
example screenshot [0]. So i have no problem about that.
For customized spam policy, I found Tuffmail has a flexible interface.
Regards.
Hi
on 2019/11/26 20:53, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Sending mail out of a MTA is always on port 25. STARTTLS is used if
possible.
If using plain port 25, the messages are not secure enough for traffic.
From what I know there is a technology calling Traffic hijacking.
Regards.
Hi
on 2019/11/26 19:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
...and there's no "starttls" on 465, that's what I meant "implicit".
while port 465 was assigned for SMTPS in January 2018, it's been used this
way on many sites/services for years (even decades)
How the traffic between big one's MTAs get
on 2019/11/26 17:02, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I would set up port 465 also. Note that TLS on 465 is implicit, while on
587 is
explicit, so it's easier to allow unencrypted connections by a mistake on
587.
587 is also used for StartTLS, am I right?
regards.
That look interesting. Do you provide a hosting plan Andre?
regards
on 2019/11/26 14:31, André Rodier wrote:
Hello, Bill.
I had the same concern a few years ago.
I have been self-hosting for more than a decade, and more recently, I
built this:
https://github.com/progmaticltd/homebox
This is
Hi
on 2019/11/26 10:22, lists wrote:
At a minimum, I would set it up to use port 587. Then block via firewall all
the email ports other than port 25 all countries from which you will not be
using the server.
Keep the attack surface small. For example don't provide for web based email.
Sorr
Hi community,
I finally got a domain from registrar, if I want to run a privacy
oriented mail server, what steps should I take?
For example, setup SSL over all, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, DNSSec, DoH,
encrypted storage, app special pasword, secondary authentication?
Is there any guide for it?
Thank
That's great explation. Thanks Richard.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/24/19 6:21 PM, Wesley Peng wrote:
> > Why it doesn’t break From: header SPF? Just curious
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, at 4:12 AM, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> >>
Why it doesn’t break From: header SPF? Just curious
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, at 4:12 AM, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > Or in short: DMARC intentionally breaks every mailinglist and every
> > mail-forwarding. So, if a mail-provider uses a strict DMARC-policy,
> > it effectively says: "Our mail-addresses
Or maybe block them by ESP? I saw there is a Perl module listing those big
providers in China.
https://metacpan.org/pod/Data::ChineseESP
regards
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 7:33 PM, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> I've blocked the entire ASIA netblocks in my ASN.
> We don't exchange any information with
I’m not sure , you may refer this discussion,
https://serverfault.com/questions/779730/why-dont-my-domains-messages-to-a-google-group-get-their-headers-rewritten-so
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 7:23 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 19:10:51 Wesley Peng pisze:
> >
> &
I totally agreed with you @Rafa.
btw, is there any good reputation, strict standard email hosting for
suggestions? I currently use fastmail, it is good for personal usage, but I
heard some privacy problems for commercial use.
thanks.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dn
Hello
if you have used a mail.ru email for google groups, when you posted message to
group, it will replace From header with the list address.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 6:43 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2019 o godz. 17:19:53 Wesley Peng pisze:
> > Google groups replace the f
Google groups replace the from: with their group address. What I know the big
providers having strict DMARC setting are:
mail.ru
laposte.net
I am glad the more large providers like gmail, outlook don’t have this stupid
setting.
Regards
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 5:13 PM, Roland Köbler wrote:
>
Thanks for helps.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/22/19 6:25 AM, Wesley Peng wrote:
> > Would this list break SPF then? Thanks
> >
> This list sends with an envelope sender in the lists domain, so it
> doesn't break general SPF, it will b
Hi
when validating DMARC, it use the envelop address, or use from address from the
header? Thanks
SA (Spamassassin) is good idea, I saw most people running their own mail
servers are using it.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, at 4:35 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * merr...@fn.de:
>
> > We did get a lot of spam messages from Chinese providers. We speak not
> > Chinese, do you think if it is possible to r
Would this list break SPF then? Thanks
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, at 7:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/21/19 11:47 PM, Wesley Peng wrote:
> > Richard Damon wrote:
> >> That is a question to ask them. Basically the strict DMARC policy is
> >> designed for transactional
I meant I didn’t get it in my mail.ru inbox. The other providers may or may not
reject it. Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, at 5:52 PM, Wesley Peng wrote:
> Hi
>
> the mail I sent from mail.ru to this list got dropped, I didn’t get the
> message I sent.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov
Hi
the mail I sent from mail.ru to this list got dropped, I didn’t get the message
I sent.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, at 4:41 PM, Nick wrote:
> On 2019-11-22 04:21 GMT, Wesley Peng wrote:
> > The email I am using is with domain of mail.ru, which has the
> > strictest DMARC
Richard Damon wrote:
The
side effect of it is that addresses on such a domain really shouldn't be
used on mailing lists,
Thanks for pointing out this. I never knew it.
Now I changed my mail to fastmail account, which I owned it for many
years. I just don't like its mobile app, it's just a
Richard Damon wrote:
That is a question to ask them. Basically the strict DMARC policy is
designed for transactional email, where spoofing is a real danger. The
side effect of it is that addresses on such a domain really shouldn't be
used on mailing lists, or any other 3rd party senders not speci
Richard Damon wrote:
The typical options for the mailing list are
1) Just not allow people from such domains to post to the list (the
reject option you mention)
2) Rewrite the from address from people from such a domain to be from
the domain of the list (often the list address). This is arguabl
Greetings,
When mail is relayed through mailing list, why the DMARC policy is
possible to reject?
For example, I sent mail from x...@mail.ru to y...@googlegroups.com
Since mail.ru has the strictest DMARC policy, the recepients may choose
to reject this mail which is relayed by googlegroups,
Hello
I saw a trend that, every ESP has taken hard work on antispam policy.
For example, from my test cases:
1. gmail totally can't be registered from PC, only mobile client (gmail,
outlook etc) can sign up a new username. they require mobile
verification in the process.
2. yahoo totally can
on 2019/10/23 16:48, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
So, you could rewrite the "To:" list into "," separated.
That sounds like what I am looking for, thanks!
How do I do that? I did not get it to work with a REPLACE in the
header_checks...
I saw postfix has a address rewrite guide you may want to ch
on 2019/10/23 16:40, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
I was just curious, why the From addr is a list of addresses?
Isn't from just a single address?
My bad - I meant to say the "To:" header!
So, you could rewrite the "To:" list into "," separated.
regards.
Hi
on 2019/10/23 16:27, luc...@dds.nl wrote:
One sending application is sending mail with a From: header containing a
semicolon-separated list of addresses. This is not according to the
standard (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.3) and is
rejected by SES:
I was just curious, w
Hello
I saw my ESP has two MX records pointing to just the same host.
rambler.ru. 21 IN MX 5 inmx.rambler.ru.
rambler.ru. 21 IN MX 10 inmx.rambler.ru.
Does this have any value inprovement?
Thanks
Hi
on 2019/10/17 16:48, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I believe email should be plaintext. I don't like HTML emails either. If
somebody feels that his message needs fancy formatting, he should send
it as pdf attachment. But emails should stay plaintext.
non-latin message body should be encoded for
As the subject stated, how can I get the statistics on the numbers of
inbout/outbound messages every day from Postfix?
Thanks & regards.
on 2019/9/26 16:42, Enrico Morelli wrote:
Can you setup spamassassin for domain blacklist?
regards.
How can do that?
The SpamAssassin whitelist and blacklist options can include globs, not
regular expressions. The valid metacharacters are ? and * to match 0-1
or 0-many characters respect
on 2019/9/26 16:34, Enrico Morelli wrote:
I tried to put .monster or *.monster in sender_access but doesn't work.
Is there a way to block *.monster mails?
Can you setup spamassassin for domain blacklist?
regards.
Hello,
though this is a little OT, but I was curious since verizon has bought
yahoo for long days, why ATT still host its customer email accounts on
yahoo platform? we know ATT and verizon are commercial competitors.
Thanks for any comments.
Hi
on 2019/9/16 20:47, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
How can I refuse mail from hosts who don't have an open port 25?
What do you think from such a check?
You shouldn't.
Many email systems have delivery agent and MTA to be separated.
That's to say, they get incoming mails from MTA which has port
Hi
on 2019/9/12 22:01, Helmut Schneider wrote:
relay=none, delay=0.09, delays=0.06/0.02/0.01/0, dsn=5.4.4,
status=bounced (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=EXCHANGE01 type=: Host not found)
This is a network issue rather than postfix problem I may think.
You shoul
Hello,
I found if peer MTA's timestamp is too much different from my end, the
messages may not be displayed.
for example, when you try to sign up to apache projects' mailing list,
like one of this page:
https://flink.apache.org/community.html
The response message's (for user to confirm) ti
Hello,
Is there the username specification for email system?
It seems most special characters like ".", "-", "+", "_", "#", "$" are
permitted in the username part.
And even ___username...@domain.com is right (like my sender account).
So I was confused.
Thanks.
viktor,
on 2019/9/4 20:09, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Perhaps, but Postfix is not a list manager. Postfix
just delivers email to the addresses in the message
envelope. If some list servers restrict posts to
subscribers, any logic to treat addresses as equivalent
would be in the list server, not P
Hello
on 2019/9/4 19:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
To signal domain equivalence, the receiver should use CNAME records
or some other explicit mechanism.
from what I know, MX host should not be CNAME records in DNS zone.
regards.
Hello,
As a mailing list server, how does postfix deal with google's mailbox
formats?
for exmaple, all mailboxes below are indeed the same one:
usern...@gmail.com
user.n...@gmail.com
usernam...@gmail.com
usern...@googlemail.com
Can list server know them and treat them as just one?
Thanks.
Maybe UDP is filtered in chroot environment. Can you try to capture the
network flow?
Jean-Philippe Méthot 于2019年8月31日 周六上午2:08写道：
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been trying to setup postfix 3.4.6 (ghettoforge.org package) with
> dovecot, mailscanner and the mailwatch frontend on a centos 7 (cloudlinux
> 7.6) s
on 2019/8/29 16:50, @lbutlr wrote:
Only if you were very careful monitor your system for the many many corporate
sanders where greylist was the effective equivalent of a blacklist (those that
did not retry in violation of RFCs and this that had many servers and would
resend from different o
54 matches
Mail list logo
