> I don't remember asking for your judgement on my motives or thought processes.
And I don't recall asking you for anything at all.
> But I'm done with it
I'm sure that makes us both happy.
Feel free to prattle on at will. That's what bit-buckets are for.
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:03 -0400, "Wietse Venema"
wrote:
> I have a suggestion. If you're not familiar with Postfix, don't
> try to use all the bells and whistles the first time. Use the
> basic features first, and add advanced features over time as
> you become more familiar with the system.
Al
Hi Wietse,
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:07 -0400, "Wietse Venema"
wrote:
> I find that Postfix documentation can always be improved. Despite
> a lot of review there are still inaccuracies and omissions.
...
> Indeed. The current documentation focuses on the basics: being
> precise (no errors or omissio
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:06 +0200, "Jeroen Geilman"
wrote:
> As the documentation for -o stress= explains
There's that persistent presumption that message sent = message
received.
I read the documentation. Lots of it. And clearly, as you've taken the
time to point out, still managed to get it
Hi Wietse
> > On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:07 -0400, "Wietse Venema"
> For more, see:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
> http://www.postfix.org/postscreen.8.html
>
> If any text in there is not 100% clear, send suggestions for
> improvement.
Since you asked about clarity in document
Hi Wietse
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:07 -0400, "Wietse Venema"
wrote:
> Postscreen is an additional line of defense. It does not replace
> the other Postfix features, but rather, it aims to reduce the
> pressure on those features.
Okay.
Is that "doesn't replace" true for all its functions?
Specif
Hi,
I've built & installed Postfix 2.8.2 from src, and followed the installs
steps & examples:
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
I've ended up with a 4-instance edg
Hi Wietse, Viktor,
Thanks for the references/links.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:19 -0400, "Victor Duchovni"
wrote:
> > So, in addition to the SSL certs for mynet{1,2,3}.net I have a wildcard
> > for *.mydomain.net.
>
> Whatever single certificate works for you. Wildcard certs from real
> CAs used t
Hi Viktor,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:59 -0400, "Victor Duchovni"
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:37:31PM -0700, dchil...@bestmail.us wrote:
>
> > I plan to host mail for 3 domains,
> >
> > mynet1.net
> > mynet2.net
> > mynet3.net
> >
> > and have SSL certs for each domain.
>
> Sorry, n
Hi,
I plan to host mail for 3 domains,
mynet1.net
mynet2.net
mynet3.net
and have SSL certs for each domain.
I have 2 servers -- one hosted with StaticIPs facing the 'net, the other
behind a dynamic IP on my LAN.
the two MX for each of my mail domains point at the two static IPs on
the ho
10 matches
Mail list logo
