com
virtual mailbox.
Is it because the same name is present in both virtual alias maps and
virtual mailbox maps ?
Kind regards
Gerrit.
and i can't figure out why.
Maybe it needs some optional parameters ( - o ) to suppress this,
because maybe the mail is injected to postfix, which responds with
another mail.
But i'm knocked down at the moment.
Thnx for your help.
Gerrit.
eader which is not apache@,
the message is still rejected.
Is there a way to get this right.
Regards,
Gerrit.
mouss schreef:
gerrit wrote:
Hi All,
Recently i implemented the sender check. First i made a split for the
processing and put some restrictions under smtpd_sender_restrictions
and some under stmpd_recipient_restrictions.
This resulted in too many rejections, so i left the sender
ork around this ? Putting the table with these
regular expressions under virtual_mailbox_maps at the end isn't a
solution, because this mapping does a mailbox lookup instead of
forwarding. Note : the mail are forwarded to a mailbox which is hosted
on the same server.
Regards,
Gerrit
