Re: limit connections

On 06.11.2020 13:48, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse > That is a configuration mistake. Postfix should not receive mail > for a deleted user. maybe you dont understand me I mean this example: : host spike.porcx.org[xxx.xxx.189.2] said: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown

Re: postfix and MX

Hi I found a solutions about MX filter in http://rmxf.comm.pl/ On 18.09.2020 01:30, @lbutlr wrote: > On 17 Sep 2020, at 17:03, Fred Morris wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Antonio Leding wrote: >>> TILT: MX records are not required for email to work — WOOT… >> Not required for SPF either. You can l

postfix and MX

Hi In e-mail incoming I need a MX restrictions - allow only domain who have add MX in DNS - I known this is not RFC friendly ... Are there any solutions ready to be imported?

Re: 2 factor authentication for postfix

On 23.07.2020 16:41, Wietse Venema wrote: > natan maciej milaszewski: >> Hi >> I am looking for a solution or some faq to running 2 factor >> authentication for Postfix3.x > To SEND mail? > > To RECEIVE mail? Only to send mail

Re: 2 factor authentication for postfix

On 23.07.2020 16:31, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 2020-07-23 09:57, natan maciej milaszewski wrote: >> Hi >> I am looking for a solution or some faq to running 2 factor >> authentication for Postfix3.x > > U. Postfix is a mail *transfer* agent. It moves mail

2 factor authentication for postfix

Hi I am looking for a solution or some faq to running 2 factor authentication for Postfix3.x

Re: probably bug in postfix3-3.4

to address 162.243.138.183: Name or service not known nothing else On 05.05.2020 19:40, Wietse Venema wrote: > natan maciej milaszewski: >> Hi >> I not found any errors: > RUN THE COMMAND DESCRIBED IN http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging > > $ egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /some/log/file | more > > Wietse

Re: probably bug in postfix3-3.4

Hi I not found any errors: May  5 06:00:52 smtp1 postfix/master[22162]: reload -- version 3.4.7, configuration /etc/postfix May  5 06:00:52 smtp1 postfix/cleanup[5718]: 49GQxc60ggz4D9D: message-id= May  5 06:00:52 smtp1 postfix/qmgr[5678]: 49GQxc60ggz4D9D: from=, size=67939, nrcpt=1 (queue active)

probably bug in postfix3-3.4

Hi I have a centos 7 and postfix3-3.4.7-1.gf.el7.x86_64 I reload postfix via: postfix reload May  5 06:00:52 smtp1 postfix/master[22162]: reload -- version 3.4.7, configuration /etc/postfix And new mail was only added to queue active They did not want to leave and the queue was growing May  5 0

Re: postfix + forwadgroup + external amavis with haproxy and no_address_mappings

Hi In that configurations cannot work delimiter in main.cf exists recipient_delimiter = + On 28.04.2020 10:15, natan maciej milaszewski wrote: > Hi > I have debian 9 and postfix 3.1.14. Generally, I have distributed mail > traffic over several machines > > - separately for sen

postfix + forwadgroup + external amavis with haproxy and no_address_mappings

Hi I have debian 9 and postfix 3.1.14. Generally, I have distributed mail traffic over several machines - separately for sent mail - here I have postfix - separately for incoming e-mails - here I have postfix + external amavis The general outline is this: 1) mail arrives at postfix 2) postfix t

dumbest questions about limit

Hi Sorry about probably dumbest questions. What does it really mean? 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit Apr 16 16:03:48 thebe4 postfix/smtpd[11692]: NOQUEUE: reject: MAIL from mail-il1-f169.google.com[209.85.166.169]: 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit; proto=ESMTP helo= Apr 16 16

postfix problem with too many errors

Hi System debian 9 and postfix  3.1.14-0+deb9u1 This is only MX server. In external server (zabbix) i add a trigger to send e-mail to my MX (1 e-mail per min) and add zabbix (86.xxx.xxx.xxx) to mynetworks in my MX server Al works fine but sometimes i get in log: Apr 16 12:38:21 thebe4 postfix/sm

Re: postfix tuning

delay to amavis delay=6.1 127.0.0.1:10628 - is local haproxy to connect to 2 external amavis+SA in master.cf smtp-amavis unix??? -?? -?? -?? -?? 60?? smtp On 20.03.2020 15:51, Wietse Venema wrote: > natan maciej milaszewski: >> Hi >> Sorry for to tri

postfix tuninh

Hi Sorry for to trivial e-mail and stupid question.I have a dedicated bare-metal server. I need some tunig postfix to faster delivery (every time i look in qshappe -it's good) Amvis and dovecot is in the external server to. virtual_transport = lmtp:inet:10.0.100.5:24 now i change: lmtp_destinati

Re: problem with transport

Hi Thenx for replay :) Working perfectly :) On 06.03.2020 13:07, Wietse Venema wrote: > natan maciej milaszewski: >> Hi >> Is it possible to second add header_checks after milter check ? > milter_header_checks are applied to headers that are added by a > Milter. This can b

Re: problem with transport

-milter/spamass-milter.sock,inet:localhost:12301 I need solutions for if find spam then hold in queue like: /^X-Spam-Flag:.YES/ HOLD text On 05.03.2020 12:19, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: > Dnia 5.03.2020 o godz. 12:06:43 natan maciej milaszewski pisze: >> I use DKIM (added like docum

Re: problem with transport

2:06:43 natan maciej milaszewski pisze: >> I use DKIM (added like documentations) >> >> In log i found double added DKIM - because the mail goes back to the >> queue and smtpd_milters tags it again ... >> >> Probably I must create a returns transport with "-o

problem with transport

Hi Sorry about my probably stupid and easy question. I have one server for outgoing smtp and I added a spamassassin to filtered outgoing e-mial This is trivial like cut master.cf: start - smtp      inet  n    -    n    -    -    smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin submission

too many errors

Hi I added zabbix to test connections - all works fine but sometimes i found in logs "too many errors after EHLO" logs: Feb 10 20:49:21 thebe4 postfix/smtpd[6609]: connect from zabbix.domain.ltd[xxx.xxx.xxx.68] Feb 10 20:49:21 thebe4 postfix/smtpd[6609]: Anonymous TLS connection established from