Re: limit connections

On 06.11.2020 13:48, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse > That is a configuration mistake. Postfix should not receive mail > for a deleted user. maybe you dont understand me I mean this example: : host spike.porcx.org[xxx.xxx.189.2] said: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown

Re: postfix and MX

Hi I found a solutions about MX filter in http://rmxf.comm.pl/ On 18.09.2020 01:30, @lbutlr wrote: > On 17 Sep 2020, at 17:03, Fred Morris wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Antonio Leding wrote: >>> TILT: MX records are not required for email to work — WOOT… >> Not required for SPF either. You can

postfix and MX

Hi In e-mail incoming I need a MX restrictions - allow only domain who have add MX in DNS - I known this is not RFC friendly ... Are there any solutions ready to be imported?

Re: 2 factor authentication for postfix

On 23.07.2020 16:41, Wietse Venema wrote: > natan maciej milaszewski: >> Hi >> I am looking for a solution or some faq to running 2 factor >> authentication for Postfix3.x > To SEND mail? > > To RECEIVE mail? Only to send mail

Re: 2 factor authentication for postfix

On 23.07.2020 16:31, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 2020-07-23 09:57, natan maciej milaszewski wrote: >> Hi >> I am looking for a solution or some faq to running 2 factor >> authentication for Postfix3.x > > U. Postfix is a mail *transfer* agent. It moves m

2 factor authentication for postfix

Hi I am looking for a solution or some faq to running 2 factor authentication for Postfix3.x

Re: probably bug in postfix3-3.4

3: Name or service not known nothing else On 05.05.2020 19:40, Wietse Venema wrote: > natan maciej milaszewski: >> Hi >> I not found any errors: > RUN THE COMMAND DESCRIBED IN http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging > > $ egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /some/log/file | more > > Wietse

Re: probably bug in postfix3-3.4

Hi I not found any errors: May  5 06:00:52 smtp1 postfix/master[22162]: reload -- version 3.4.7, configuration /etc/postfix May  5 06:00:52 smtp1 postfix/cleanup[5718]: 49GQxc60ggz4D9D: message-id= May  5 06:00:52 smtp1 postfix/qmgr[5678]: 49GQxc60ggz4D9D: from=, size=67939, nrcpt=1 (queue

probably bug in postfix3-3.4

Hi I have a centos 7 and postfix3-3.4.7-1.gf.el7.x86_64 I reload postfix via: postfix reload May  5 06:00:52 smtp1 postfix/master[22162]: reload -- version 3.4.7, configuration /etc/postfix And new mail was only added to queue active They did not want to leave and the queue was growing May  5

Re: postfix + forwadgroup + external amavis with haproxy and no_address_mappings

Hi In that configurations cannot work delimiter in main.cf exists recipient_delimiter = + On 28.04.2020 10:15, natan maciej milaszewski wrote: > Hi > I have debian 9 and postfix 3.1.14. Generally, I have distributed mail > traffic over several machines > > - separately for sen

postfix + forwadgroup + external amavis with haproxy and no_address_mappings

Hi I have debian 9 and postfix 3.1.14. Generally, I have distributed mail traffic over several machines - separately for sent mail - here I have postfix - separately for incoming e-mails - here I have postfix + external amavis The general outline is this: 1) mail arrives at postfix 2) postfix

dumbest questions about limit

Hi Sorry about probably dumbest questions. What does it really mean? 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit Apr 16 16:03:48 thebe4 postfix/smtpd[11692]: NOQUEUE: reject: MAIL from mail-il1-f169.google.com[209.85.166.169]: 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit; proto=ESMTP helo= Apr 16

postfix problem with too many errors

Hi System debian 9 and postfix  3.1.14-0+deb9u1 This is only MX server. In external server (zabbix) i add a trigger to send e-mail to my MX (1 e-mail per min) and add zabbix (86.xxx.xxx.xxx) to mynetworks in my MX server Al works fine but sometimes i get in log: Apr 16 12:38:21 thebe4

Re: postfix tuning

delay to amavis delay=6.1 127.0.0.1:10628 - is local haproxy to connect to 2 external amavis+SA in master.cf smtp-amavis unix??? -?? -?? -?? -?? 60?? smtp On 20.03.2020 15:51, Wietse Venema wrote: > natan maciej milaszewski: >> Hi >> Sorry for to

postfix tuninh

Hi Sorry for to trivial e-mail and stupid question.I have a dedicated bare-metal server. I need some tunig postfix to faster delivery (every time i look in qshappe -it's good) Amvis and dovecot is in the external server to. virtual_transport = lmtp:inet:10.0.100.5:24 now i change:

Re: problem with transport

Hi Thenx for replay :) Working perfectly :) On 06.03.2020 13:07, Wietse Venema wrote: > natan maciej milaszewski: >> Hi >> Is it possible to second add header_checks after milter check ? > milter_header_checks are applied to headers that are added by a > Milter. This can b

Re: problem with transport

-milter/spamass-milter.sock,inet:localhost:12301 I need solutions for if find spam then hold in queue like: /^X-Spam-Flag:.YES/ HOLD text On 05.03.2020 12:19, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: > Dnia 5.03.2020 o godz. 12:06:43 natan maciej milaszewski pisze: >> I use DKIM (added like docum

Re: problem with transport

2:06:43 natan maciej milaszewski pisze: >> I use DKIM (added like documentations) >> >> In log i found double added DKIM - because the mail goes back to the >> queue and smtpd_milters tags it again ... >> >> Probably I must create a returns transport with "-o

problem with transport

Hi Sorry about my probably stupid and easy question. I have one server for outgoing smtp and I added a spamassassin to filtered outgoing e-mial This is trivial like cut master.cf: start - smtp      inet  n    -    n    -    -    smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin submission

too many errors

Hi I added zabbix to test connections - all works fine but sometimes i found in logs "too many errors after EHLO" logs: Feb 10 20:49:21 thebe4 postfix/smtpd[6609]: connect from zabbix.domain.ltd[xxx.xxx.xxx.68] Feb 10 20:49:21 thebe4 postfix/smtpd[6609]: Anonymous TLS connection established from