On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Jack S jacklistm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I have a problem that I am trying to resolve in emergency mode.
I have a bunch of email in the derferred queue for a domain, their
destination server will be down for a while so I need to create a way
to get
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:21 AM, mailing list subscriber
mailinglist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two issues.
After hard reading
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
soft_bounce works
update: interesting, header_check gives 5xx but user unknown gives
correct 4xx response:
Jul 30 01:49:01 mailhost postfix-in/smtpd[3685]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from relay3.isp.ro[IP_ADDR]: 450 4.1.1 oldu...@mydomain.ro:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown;
Ok, this¹ has been raised over a few times in the past, but I'm not
satisfied with the answer (referral to man page of lmtp/smtp instead
of idiot-proof narrative version like other *_README howtos).
1. Do the cached file contents still apply to current release version
of postfix?
2. If yes, why is
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
version of everything.
Wietse
*** ./dict_sqlite.c- Fri Jun 18 20:19:15 2010
--- ./dict_sqlite.c Thu Sep 9 11:01:12 2010
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:27:12 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
version of everything.
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:43:56 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
If you want Postfix to support the obsolete API then you
cannot remove support for the preferred API.
Sorry for delay with answer. I'll send this diff as workaround. Because
I'm
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
I use postfix with sqlite patch
(Looks like my previous letters has been failed to deliver. so I resend
it)
Due version of sqlite in CentOS5 last snapshots 20100618 and alter does
not compile
with next error:
dict_sqlite.c:71:2: error: #error Your SQLite version is too old
dict_sqlite.c: In function 'dict_sqlite_lookup':
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
function
name. I
suggest to make something like this for postfix 2.8. Or maybe
12 matches
Mail list logo
