On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:31:49 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
[...]
> I must admit, it sounds feasible (timing between keystrokes etc.),
With respect to detection, is this relevant?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telnet#Telnet_data
--
If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange t
I vaguely remember managing an email server around 1997 and there was
a checkbox to disable telnet access. IIRC it was Imail on windows NT
4, but that was a long time ago. I do remember thinking it was odd
that they could discriminate, but it seemed to work - though I'm not
sure how or why.
-B
* N. Yaakov Ziskind :
> Kinda reminds me of the Donald Westlake story, which described a
> fine-arts painter who took to counterfeiting $20s; the Secret Service
> let him go with a slap on the wrist, they said, when they figured out
> it him hours to produce each note. :-)
Exactly my point.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote (on Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:57:42AM +0200):
> > Administrators of sites that want to trouble-shoot connectivity issues
> > with your server will use "telnet 25" from time to time. There is no
> > need to block this, it is by far the least likely source of any
> > significant
* Victor Duchovni :
> > Anyway. Is there such a thing? Does anybody use such a thing?
>
> Why do you want to discriminate against "telnet 25"?
What do i know? I don't do this nonsense :) 'm just asking
> Administrators of sites that want to trouble-shoot connectivity issues
> with your server w
On Jun 10, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:31:49PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>> I heard that there are firewalls/security appliances that supposedly
>> can distinguish "somebody using telnet" from "a machine speaking SMTP".
>>
>> I must admit, it soun
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:31:49PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I heard that there are firewalls/security appliances that supposedly
> can distinguish "somebody using telnet" from "a machine speaking SMTP".
>
> I must admit, it sounds feasible (timing between keystrokes etc.), but
> little us
+-- Ralf Hildebrandt wrote (Thu, 10-Jun-2010, 23:31 +0200):
|
| I heard that there are firewalls/security appliances that supposedly
| can distinguish "somebody using telnet" from "a machine speaking SMTP".
|
| I must admit, it sounds feasible (timing between keystrokes etc.), but
| little us
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> I heard that there are firewalls/security appliances that supposedly
> can distinguish "somebody using telnet" from "a machine speaking SMTP".
>
> I must admit, it sounds feasible (timing between keystrokes etc.), but
> little useful.
>
W
I heard that there are firewalls/security appliances that supposedly
can distinguish "somebody using telnet" from "a machine speaking SMTP".
I must admit, it sounds feasible (timing between keystrokes etc.), but
little useful.
Anyway. Is there such a thing? Does anybody use such a thing?
--
Ra
On 6/10/2010 5:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I heard that there are firewalls/security appliances that supposedly
can distinguish "somebody using telnet" from "a machine speaking SMTP".
I must admit, it sounds feasible (timing between keystrokes etc.), but
little useful.
Anyway. Is there such
On 06/10/2010 11:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I heard that there are firewalls/security appliances that supposedly
can distinguish "somebody using telnet" from "a machine speaking SMTP".
I must admit, it sounds feasible (timing between keystrokes etc.), but
little useful.
Anyway. Is there suc
12 matches
Mail list logo
