Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
> In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
> time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of the reason is that
> squirrelmail comes with RHEL, so it's kept up to date automatically,
> while customers install their own roundcube and
On 02/01/2010 06:49 PM, Kay wrote:
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube dire
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
> Debian package:
>
> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
> Package: roundcube
> New: yes
> State: installed
> Automatically installed: no
> Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1
Eh? 0
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
>> Debian package:
>>
>> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
>> Package: roundcube
>> New: yes
>> State: insta
* fakessh :
> > Eh? 0.3.1 is the current version, so how is 0.2.2 'up to date'?
>
> attention
>
> 0.3.1 is the current version , so 0.2.2 is 'up to date'
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
Charles Marcus put forth on 2/1/2010 4:17 PM:
> On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
>> Debian package:
>>
>> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
>> Package: roundcube
>> New: yes
>> State: installed
>> Automa
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/1/2010 4:31 PM:
> That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
I wish it was humor... Debian Stable always lags pretty seriously behind the
cutting edge release versions of a lot of packages. Then again, from what I
understand, so do RHEL, CentOS, SLES, a
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current
> version of Roundcube.
Then you haven't looked at it... the new features are really nice...
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current
>> version of Roundcube.
>
> Then you haven't looked at it... the new features are really nice...
I would say this is
thanks for all
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
> wrote:
> > On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my
> current
> >> version of Roundcube.
> >
> > T
K bharathan put forth on 2/2/2010 10:49 AM:
> thanks for all
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
>> wrote:
>>> On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality
Hi!
Sorry for keeping the "off-topic"... but I had to answer
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
>
>> In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
>> time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of the reason is
12 matches
Mail list logo
