[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: Question about postscreen

2023-11-02 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users : > > And thus the solution is: Don't use the dnsbl in postscreen, but ONLY > > in spamassassin/rspamd instead. > > No problem, you can safely use postscreen with multiple DNSBLs and DNSWLs. > - just don't rely on single hit, unless it's your own DNSBL.

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: Question about postscreen

2023-11-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 02.11.23 10:49, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote: > Hi, it's possible that postscreen does not block the email when > postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is reached but to pass that email to > spamassassin(with a score and a tag). * Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users : Postscreen does not

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: Question about postscreen

2023-11-02 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users : > On 02.11.23 10:49, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote: > > Hi, it's possible that postscreen does not block the email when > > postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is reached but to pass that email to > > spamassassin(with a score and a tag). > > Postscreen