Thanks for your advice.
Am 25.01.2024 22:56 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:48:39PM -0500, Bill Cole via Postfix-users
wrote:
> - Are you expected exactly one recipient per-invocation of the
> spamassassin filter? I'm not sure how spamc handles multipl
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:48:39PM -0500, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> > - Are you expected exactly one recipient per-invocation of the
> > spamassassin filter? I'm not sure how spamc handles multiple
> > recipients after "-u".
>
> It doesn't. The argument to '-u' is a key to identif
On 2024-01-25 at 11:58:56 UTC-0500 (Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:58:56 -0500)
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
- Are you expected exactly one recipient per-invocation of the
spamassassin filter? I'm not sure how spamc handles multiple
recipients after "-u".
It doesn't. T
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:04:38PM +, hawky--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> we're in the process to integrate SpamAssassin in our mail system. We
> decided to use the after-queue attempt with
>
> > smtpd -o content_filter=
> The problem we're facing right now is that pipe is getting the alias
