On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:31:30 -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users:
> > What is the relation between new "smtpd_forbid_unauth_pipelining"
> > and existing "reject_unauth_pipelining" in smtpd_*_restrictions?
>
> smtpd_forbid_unauth_pipelining disconne
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 09:48:11 -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> > > * Optional: harden a Postfix SMTP server against remote SMTP
> > > clients that violate RFC 2920 (or 5321) command pipelining
> >
Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 09:48:11 -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > * Optional: harden a Postfix SMTP server against remote SMTP
> > clients that violate RFC 2920 (or 5321) command pipelining
> > constraints. With "smtpd_forbid_unauth_pi
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 09:48:11 -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> * Optional: harden a Postfix SMTP server against remote SMTP
> clients that violate RFC 2920 (or 5321) command pipelining
> constraints. With "smtpd_forbid_unauth_pipelining = yes", the
> server disconnec
