[pfx] Re: bounce management

2023-08-08 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users: > >> > We're only doing basic spam protection for them, > >> > >> What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done > >> pre-queue? > > On 07.08.23 15:19, Alex via Postfix-users wrote: > >Yes, most likely, I would think. It's a basic spama

[pfx] Re: bounce management

2023-08-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 01:28:51PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: > >> > We're only doing basic spam protection for them, > >> > >> What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done > >> pre-queue? > > On 07.08.23 15:19, Alex via Postfix-users wrote: > >Y

[pfx] Re: bounce management

2023-08-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> We're only doing basic spam protection for them, What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done pre-queue? On 07.08.23 15:19, Alex via Postfix-users wrote: Yes, most likely, I would think. It's a basic spamassassin setup with a few rules looking for specific patterns, as

[pfx] Re: bounce management

2023-08-07 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 03:19:59PM -0400, Alex wrote: > > The only plausible solution on your end is to not queue mail for this > > domain, but rather proxy it through to the destination, with the > > response to "." coming from the final downstream systems. This may be > > possible with: > > > >

[pfx] Re: bounce management

2023-08-07 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Alex via Postfix-users: > Hi, > > > > > We're only doing basic spam protection for them, > > > > What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done > > pre-queue? > > > > Yes, most likely, I would think. It's a basic spamassassin setup with a few > rules looking for specific patt

[pfx] Re: bounce management

2023-08-07 Thread Alex via Postfix-users
Hi, > > We're only doing basic spam protection for them, > > What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done > pre-queue? > Yes, most likely, I would think. It's a basic spamassassin setup with a few rules looking for specific patterns, as well as some RBL network checks. The

[pfx] Re: bounce management

2023-08-07 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:24:30AM -0400, Alex via Postfix-users wrote: > We're only doing basic spam protection for them, What is the nature of the "basic spam protection"? Can it be done pre-queue? The only plausible solution on your end is to not queue mail for this domain, but rather proxy