Am 06.07.23 um 21:39 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
So the service provider advertises, but fails to implement "PLAIN", that
sounds like a bad idea. Open a bug report. They should not do that.
I did have one open. More for cram-md5 than plain, of course. The issue
is: For older
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 06:38:34PM +0200, Ede Wolf via Postfix-users wrote:
> Jep, I just retested. Changed to plain, restarted postfix and mail gets
> deferred:
>
> relay=smtp.worldserver.net[217.13.200.36]:587, delay=1,
> delays=0.07/0.01/0.95/0, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (SASL authenticatio
Am 06.07.23 um 14:51 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
I am surprised to hear that "login" works and "plain" does not, are you
sure about that?
Jep, I just retested. Changed to plain, restarted postfix and mail gets
deferred:
relay=smtp.worldserver.net[217.13.200.36]:587, delay=
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 08:10:39AM +0200, Ede Wolf via Postfix-users wrote:
> > BINGO! The server is advertising CRAM-MD5, and unless you filter it out
> > SASL will attempt to use that instead of plain. Therefore, in the
> > proposed "master.cf" entry you also need:
> >
> > -o { smtp_sasl
Hello Viktor,
again, thanks very much for your help
See below, with the critical additional detail you present now (and
sadly did not know to present before), there's more to be done.
The problem here is, that the annoucement of CRAM-MD5 is false. While it
still does work for older account
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 10:09:12PM +0200, Ede Wolf via Postfix-users wrote:
> thanks very much for your reply. I still may have some understanding issues:
>
> Am 05.07.23 um 16:22 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:42:54PM +0200, Ede Wolf via Postfix-users w
Hello Viktor,
thanks very much for your reply. I still may have some understanding issues:
Am 05.07.23 um 16:22 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:42:54PM +0200, Ede Wolf via Postfix-users wrote:
I am having a weired issue. My provider for the relayhost swit
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:42:54PM +0200, Ede Wolf via Postfix-users wrote:
> I am having a weired issue. My provider for the relayhost switched to
> SSL - which is fine by itself - but that also changed the authentication
> scheme.
What SASL mechanism was used before that? You're in fact gene
