Hi!
I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours I've been
getting: "host ... refused to talk to me: 421 service not available
(connection refused, too many connections)" for all the outgoing mail,
all destination servers.
What's wrong?
I wasn't even able to subscribe to this m
On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours I've been
> getting: "host ... refused to talk to me: 421 service not available
> (connection refused, too many connections)" for all the outgoing mail,
> all destination server
On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours I've been
>> getting: "host ... refused to talk to me: 421 service not available
>> (connection refused, too many connections
On 2012-03-04 11:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>> On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours I've been
>>> getting: "host ... refused to talk to me: 421 service not ava
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:24:44PM +0100, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 11:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> >> On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> >>> I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours
> >>> I'v
On 04.03.2012 19:24, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 11:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>>> On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
Hi!
I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours I've been
getti
On 2012-03-04 17:14, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:24:44PM +0100, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>> On 2012-03-04 11:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> I am running a small Postfix ser
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:12:00AM +0100, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 17:14, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:24:44PM +0100, Stanisław Findeisen
> > wrote:
> >> On 2012-03-04 11:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >>> On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On
On Monday, March 5, 2012, 09:53:31, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> ...
> Another WAG: maybe your ISP's upstream provider got tired of
> complaints and implemented this redirection upstream. This would
> explain why the ISP would not know.
I would be horrified is this turned out to be the cause.
Without dee
Rod Dorman:
> On Monday, March 5, 2012, 09:53:31, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > ...
> > Another WAG: maybe your ISP's upstream provider got tired of
> > complaints and implemented this redirection upstream. This would
> > explain why the ISP would not know.
>
> I would be horrified is this turned out to
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:21:30AM -0500, Rod Dorman wrote:
> On Monday, March 5, 2012, 09:53:31, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > ...
> > Another WAG: maybe your ISP's upstream provider got tired of
> > complaints and implemented this redirection upstream. This would
> > explain why the ISP would not know.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:06:26AM -0600, I wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:21:30AM -0500, Rod Dorman wrote:
> > On Monday, March 5, 2012, 09:53:31, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Another WAG: maybe your ISP's upstream provider got tired of
> > > complaints and implemented this redirection u
On Monday, March 5, 2012, 12:06:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Rod Dorman:
>> On Monday, March 5, 2012, 09:53:31, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> > ...
>> > Another WAG: maybe your ISP's upstream provider got tired of
>> > complaints and implemented this redirection upstream. This would
>> > explain why the ISP
On 2012-03-05 15:53, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:12:00AM +0100, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>> On 2012-03-04 17:14, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:24:44PM +0100, Stanisław Findeisen
>>> wrote:
On 2012-03-04 11:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 04.03.2012 13
2012/3/5 Stanisław Findeisen :
> My bad suspicion is that they are in the process of installing some
> (more or less crappy) mail intercepting facility (i.e. to spy on users)
> and that this is probably the government who ordered that. This is
> Europe (Poland) but do you think such things are unc
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:44:57 +0100
Stanisław Findeisen articulated:
> My bad suspicion is that they are in the process of installing some
> (more or less crappy) mail intercepting facility (i.e. to spy on
> users) and that this is probably the government who ordered that.
> This is Europe (Poland)
On 3/5/2012 1:44 PM, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> My bad suspicion is that they are in the process of installing some
> (more or less crappy) mail intercepting facility (i.e. to spy on users)
> and that this is probably the government who ordered that. This is
> Europe (Poland) but do you think su
17 matches
Mail list logo
