Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-06 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* DTNX Postmaster postmas...@dtnx.net: On May 4, 2012, at 13:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067 The evidence section lists inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255, yet spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)! 93.218.0.0/15 includes large

Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-05 Thread DTNX Postmaster
On May 4, 2012, at 13:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067 The evidence section lists inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255, yet spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)! 93.218.0.0/15 includes large parts of german Deutsche Telekom dialups :|

A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067 The evidence section lists inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255, yet spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)! 93.218.0.0/15 includes large parts of german Deutsche Telekom dialups :| -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung

Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-04 Thread Marko Weber
WTF ! Am 04.05.2012 13:12, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067 The evidence section lists inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255, yet spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)! 93.218.0.0/15 includes large parts of german Deutsche Telekom dialups :|

Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-04 Thread Steve
May 2012 14:13:59 +0200 Von: Marko Weber we...@zackbummfertig.de An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus: WTF ! Am 04.05.2012 13:12, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067 The evidence section lists inetnum

Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Steve stev...@gmx.net: 1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect. 2) I hope you guys don't just blindly trust one RBL provider? Postscreen allows perfectly to craft weighted BL. 3) Instead of shouting out here has any one reported them their mistake? It has been fixed. --

Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-04 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2012-05-04 Steve wrote: 1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect. 2) I hope you guys don't just blindly trust one RBL provider? Postscreen allows perfectly to craft weighted BL. policyd-weight does weighted checks, too. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time

Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-04 Thread Steve
Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 4 May 2012 14:34:45 +0200 Von: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus: * Steve stev...@gmx.net: 1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect. 2

Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

2012-05-04 Thread Steve
Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 4 May 2012 14:36:44 +0200 Von: Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus: On 2012-05-04 Steve wrote: 1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect. 2) I hope