On 6/25/09 10:16 PM, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned
before the queue-id.
My bad reading of src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c, then. But
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:40:32PM -0700, Rob Tanner wrote:
On 6/25/09 10:16 PM, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned
before
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
I¹ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns
an ³OK² and doesn¹t otherwise make any decisions. What I¹m noticing is many
of the client requests do not even contain the instance attribute. My
assumption from reading the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns
an ?OK? and doesn?t otherwise make any decisions. What I?m noticing is many
of the client requests do not
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and
returns
an ?OK? and doesn?t otherwise make any decisions. What
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned
before the queue-id.
My bad reading of src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c, then. But does that mean an
instance can exist *before* the first recipient is
