Allowing OK instead of just DUNNO in check_recipient_mx_access

2009-06-29 Thread postfix-list
The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of "OK" is not allowed for safety reasons.' Is there a way to bypass this? I wish to make check_recipient_mx_access into a whitelist instead of a blacklist. Alternatively is there a way of REJECT-ing all mail that does not match the desired entries (curre

Re: Allowing OK instead of just DUNNO in check_recipient_mx_access

2009-06-29 Thread Noel Jones
postfix-l...@monmouth.com wrote: The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of "OK" is not allowed for safety reasons.' Is there a way to bypass this? No. I wish to make check_recipient_mx_access into a whitelist instead of a blacklist. Alternatively is there a way of REJECT-ing all mail tha

Re: Allowing OK instead of just DUNNO in check_recipient_mx_access

2009-06-29 Thread Jan P. Kessler
Noel Jones wrote: > postfix-l...@monmouth.com wrote: >> The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of "OK" is not allowed for >> safety reasons.' >> Is there a way to bypass this? > > No. Is it possible to use permit_auth_destination here?

Re: Allowing OK instead of just DUNNO in check_recipient_mx_access

2009-06-29 Thread Noel Jones
Jan P. Kessler wrote: Noel Jones wrote: postfix-l...@monmouth.com wrote: The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of "OK" is not allowed for safety reasons.' Is there a way to bypass this? No. Is it possible to use permit_auth_destination here? No, nothing that resolves to an OK or permit

Re: Allowing OK instead of just DUNNO in check_recipient_mx_access

2009-06-29 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, June 29, 2009 22:59, postfix-l...@monmouth.com wrote: > The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of "OK" is not allowed for safety > reasons.' > Is there a way to bypass this? I wish to make check_recipient_mx_access into > a whitelist instead of a blacklist. dont make it with mx recipie

Re: Allowing OK instead of just DUNNO in check_recipient_mx_access

2009-06-29 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Mon, June 29, 2009 22:59, postfix-l...@monmouth.com wrote: > Alternatively is there a way of REJECT-ing all mail that does not match the > desired entries (currently set to DUNNO) short of > explicitly enumerating all TLD's and appending REJECT to each of them, which > is kind of kludgy and w