Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-02 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, furio ercolessi wrote: > > Their recommended setting is > > reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.[2..99], > reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.[2..99], > reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.[2..99] > > Return code

Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-02 Thread furio ercolessi
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:08:40PM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote: > > This is expanding a bit on Elijah's OP, but here are my current > restrictions that I've been running for a while: > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > [...] > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, > reject_rhsbl_cl

Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-01 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Elijah Savage wrote: > Again thanks for all the great recommendations, I now have a few ways of > trying to combat this if my plan doesn't work. > > I have a utilized my spam filtering agent combined with a no rDNS rule and > increased the score of that rule. > >

RE: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-01 Thread Elijah Savage
ve some of the others a try. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 2:52 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic

Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-01 Thread Noel Jones
On 6/1/2015 1:28 PM, Rich Wales wrote: > >> The reject_non_fqdn_hostname restriction will not block any of these. > > How about reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname instead? This one is > supposed to reject clients with no IP-address-to-name mapping. > > Rich Wales > ri...@richw.org > Yes,

Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-01 Thread Rich Wales
> The reject_non_fqdn_hostname restriction will not block any of these. How about reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname instead? This one is supposed to reject clients with no IP-address-to-name mapping. Rich Wales ri...@richw.org

Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-01 Thread Wietse Venema
Elijah Savage: > I am seeing thousands of spam messages beginning on Thursday of last week > from the same subnet. I know it is not best practice to fight spam by > outright blocking ip addresses but I am seeing this across multiple domains > in different parts of the country. The easy and immediat

RE: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-01 Thread Elijah Savage
-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 1:30 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question On 6/1/2015 11:09 AM, Elijah Savage wrote: > I am seeing thousands of s

Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic but there is a postfix question

2015-06-01 Thread Noel Jones
On 6/1/2015 11:09 AM, Elijah Savage wrote: > I am seeing thousands of spam messages beginning on Thursday of last > week from the same subnet. I know it is not best practice to fight > spam by outright blocking ip addresses but I am seeing this across > multiple domains in different parts of the co