Best practice: Spam-filtering outgoing e-mail

Hi, we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound spam. The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform outbound spam filtering following these rules (it's a bit more complicated than this, but

Re: Best practice: Spam-filtering outgoing e-mail

On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:40 +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote: > Hi, > > we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute > force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound > spam. > > The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform outbound spam > f

Re: Best practice: Spam-filtering outgoing e-mail

Vegard Svanberg a écrit : > Hi, > > we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute > force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound > spam. > > The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform outbound spam > filtering following these rules (i

Re: Best practice: Spam-filtering outgoing e-mail

ram a écrit : > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:40 +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute >> force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound >> spam. >> >> The best idea we've come up with so far is to perfo

Re: Best practice: Spam-filtering outgoing e-mail

mouss wrote: ram a écrit : On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:40 +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote: Hi, we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound spam. The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform