Hello,
We plan to add the possibility for our users to choose that messages
categorized as spam are put on the hold queue instead of the default
reject. Thus it'll be possible to release the false positives, which
can make life easier for them.
Currently I can see two ways to accomplish it, bo
Jozsef Kadlecsik:
> Hello,
>
> We plan to add the possibility for our users to choose that messages
> categorized as spam are put on the hold queue instead of the default
> reject. Thus it'll be possible to release the false positives, which
> can make life easier for them.
>
> Currently I can
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jozsef Kadlecsik:
> >
> > How could one achieve that the held messages are separated from the normal
> > traffic (i.e. hold queue on another partition), but if the messages cannot
> > be held, then those gets rejected instead of queued?
>
> Given Pos
Jozsef Kadlecsik:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Jozsef Kadlecsik:
> > >
> > > How could one achieve that the held messages are separated from the normal
> > > traffic (i.e. hold queue on another partition), but if the messages cannot
> > > be held, then those gets rejected inste
Jozsef Kadlecsik a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> We plan to add the possibility for our users to choose that messages
> categorized as spam are put on the hold queue instead of the default
> reject. Thus it'll be possible to release the false positives, which
> can make life easier for them.
>
> Curren
