Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-05 Thread Dave Jones
Am 04.09.2014 um 18:23 schrieb LuKreme: dwl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[2;3]*-3 swl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[12;13]*-3 AFAIR someone posted a few months ago that those lists are empty. Has that changed? Nope. They are still empty. I just checked my fresh data feed and they only have one test

Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-04 Thread LuKreme
About 95% of the rejections/blocked from postscreen show up as “blocked by zen.spamhaus.org” in the logs even though I have several other RBLs checked by postscreen. Almost all the ones that are not listing zen, are listing the DUL list, and the rest are listing “dnsbl.sorbs.net” (without a

Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-04 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:23 AM -0600 LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: About 95% of the rejections/blocked from postscreen show up as blocked by zen.spamhaus.org in the logs even though I have several other RBLs checked by postscreen. RBL rejections are generally done in order

Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-04 Thread Wietse Venema
LuKreme: How does post screen decide which RBL to list in the log? It blames the DNSBL with the largest weight. The initial postscreen implementation blamed the DNSBL that replied first. That was considered misleading, especially when that DNSBL contributed very little to the total score.

Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-04 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:23 AM -0600 LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: About 95% of the rejections/blocked from postscreen show up as blocked by zen.spamhaus.org in the logs even though I have several other RBLs checked by postscreen. RBL rejections

Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-04 Thread LuKreme
On 04 Sep 2014, at 10:44 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: LuKreme: How does post screen decide which RBL to list in the log? It blames the DNSBL with the largest weight. The initial postscreen implementation blamed the DNSBL that replied first. That was considered misleading,

Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-04 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, September 04, 2014 1:47 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: postscreen queries DNS[BW]Ls in parallel. The blame is based on the DNSBL weight, as described in my other follow-up. Ah, sorry, I should have noticed postscreen vs postfix. ;) --Quanah -- Quanah

Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-04 Thread Wietse Venema
LuKreme: On 04 Sep 2014, at 10:44 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: LuKreme: How does post screen decide which RBL to list in the log? It blames the DNSBL with the largest weight. The initial postscreen implementation blamed the DNSBL that replied first. That was

Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

2014-09-04 Thread Alex JOST
Am 04.09.2014 um 18:23 schrieb LuKreme: dwl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[2;3]*-3 swl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[12;13]*-3 AFAIR someone posted a few months ago that those lists are empty. Has that changed? -- Alex JOST