On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:54:00PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > slow_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = 0
>
> This is what you should have in main.cf, however there is a bug
> in either the implementation or the documentation and the queue manager
> is looking for:
>
> slow
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 07:32:57PM -0800, Jacky Chan wrote:
> Jan 30 11:16:36 mailgw1 postfix-slow/smtp[16362]: 6EB522EDD17:
> to=, relay=d.mx.mail.yahoo.com[66.196.82.7]:25,
> delay=214, delays=0.11/176/35/2.3, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 ok dirdel 4/1)
>
> Jan 30 11:16:36 mailgw1 postfix/qmgr[16
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
> "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Defer-Retry-tp21722888p21740901.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:52:09PM -0800, Jacky Chan wrote:
>
> Thx, I did "postfix reload".
> How do I verify the _failed_cohort_limit = 0 is been taking effect since
> postconf doesn't show self-defined transport parameter.
Just make sure "postconf default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort
elivery temporarily suspended: host
>> c.mx.mail.yahoo.com[216.39.53.3] refused to talk to me: 421 Message from
>
> This proves that the queue manager never got the _failed_cohort_limit = 0.
>
> Wietse
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Defer-Retry-tp21722888p21740121.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Jacky Chan:
>
> I tried to set slow_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = 0, and send
And you also need to "postfix reload" before the change takes effect.
> Jan 30 09:09:35 mailgw1 postfix/error[15341]: B10952EDE00:
> to=, relay=none, delay=4.1, delays=0.1/4/0/0.04,
> dsn=4.0.0, status=
.@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
>
> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
> send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
> "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Defer-Retry-tp21722888p21739964.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:47:42AM -0800, Jacky Chan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I implemented slow transport with delay of 5 mins in Postfix 2.5, when my
> client send a lot of messages at a time, I notice that Postfix active queued
> queued most of this messages. A symptom occurs when one of the sl
transport
destination.
Thx.
Best regards,
Jacky
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Defer-Retry-tp21722888p21722888.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
