On 2018-03-01 05:16, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:49 PM, MRob wrote:
OK thanks Victor a lot. Does that mean I should also remove
smtp_tls_session_cache_database?
NO.
I typoed in my last email (YES/NO), so anyways I think I understand
thanks to your time taken to do some e
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:14 AM, MRob wrote:
>
> If I was useing smtpd_tls_session_cache_database does it disable session
> tickets?
No, but it wastes space on the server, caching sessions the client is unlikely
to use.
> BTW, are smtpd session tickets shared along multi-instances?
No. Nor s
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:49 PM, MRob wrote:
>
> OK thanks Victor a lot. Does that mean I should also remove
> smtp_tls_session_cache_database?
NO.
--
Viktor.
On 2018-03-01 04:49, MRob wrote:
On 2018-03-01 04:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob wrote:
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
anything in the docs now.
You're bette
On 2018-03-01 04:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob wrote:
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
anything in the docs now.
You're better of without it, because session t
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob wrote:
>
> I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you shouldn't
> set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see anything in the docs
> now.
You're better of without it, because session tickets do the job
better.
> Readin
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
anything in the docs now.
Reading docs still it seems smtpd_tls_session_cache_database can be
useful. What is behavior when its empty(default)?
