Re: Do I need postscreen_blacklist_action = enforce to whitelist?

2012-10-01 Thread francis picabia
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:58:33AM -0300, francis picabia wrote: When the remote site attempts to deliver it is caught in blocklist: Sep 28 05:29:50 mx10 postfix/postscreen[15338]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from

Re: Do I need postscreen_blacklist_action = enforce to whitelist?

2012-09-28 Thread Wietse Venema
francis picabia: # cat postscreen_access 210.44.128.104PERMIT Do postfix reload after changing this table. Wietse

Re: Do I need postscreen_blacklist_action = enforce to whitelist?

2012-09-28 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:58:33AM -0300, francis picabia wrote: When the remote site attempts to deliver it is caught in blocklist: Sep 28 05:29:50 mx10 postfix/postscreen[15338]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [210.44.128.104]:33372: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; client [210.44.128.104]