Re: Effects of very large message_size_limit?

2016-09-16 Thread @lbutlr
On Thu Sep 15 2016 14:00:46 mro...@insiberia.net said: > > But can anyone answer my question - what factors should I consider when > increasing the limit in the 30-50MB range (or higher)? Are there drawbacks to > doing this? The main factor is that the limit used

Re: Effects of very large message_size_limit?

2016-09-15 Thread Wietse Venema
mro...@insiberia.net: > On 2016-09-15 13:55, wie...@porcupine.org wrote: > > mro...@insiberia.net: > >> On 2016-09-14 23:34, Robert Schetterer wrote: > >> > Am 15.09.2016 um 07:19 schrieb mro...@insiberia.net: > >> >> Hi, I'm wondering what the downside of setting a large > >> >>

Re: Effects of very large message_size_limit?

2016-09-15 Thread mrobti
On 2016-09-15 13:55, wie...@porcupine.org wrote: mro...@insiberia.net: On 2016-09-14 23:34, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 15.09.2016 um 07:19 schrieb mro...@insiberia.net: >> Hi, I'm wondering what the downside of setting a large >> message_size_limit are? >> >> By "large" I mean 30MB, 40MB,

Re: Effects of very large message_size_limit?

2016-09-15 Thread Wietse Venema
mro...@insiberia.net: > On 2016-09-14 23:34, Robert Schetterer wrote: > > Am 15.09.2016 um 07:19 schrieb mro...@insiberia.net: > >> Hi, I'm wondering what the downside of setting a large > >> message_size_limit are? > >> > >> By "large" I mean 30MB, 40MB, 50MB > >> > >> I think sendmail has a

Re: Effects of very large message_size_limit?

2016-09-15 Thread mrobti
On 2016-09-14 23:34, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 15.09.2016 um 07:19 schrieb mro...@insiberia.net: Hi, I'm wondering what the downside of setting a large message_size_limit are? By "large" I mean 30MB, 40MB, 50MB I think sendmail has a default of no restriction for message size - that seems

Re: Effects of very large message_size_limit?

2016-09-15 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2016-09-15 07:19, mro...@insiberia.net wrote: Hi, I'm wondering what the downside of setting a large message_size_limit are? By "large" I mean 30MB, 40MB, 50MB I think sendmail has a default of no restriction for message size - that seems crazy, but maybe I don't understand the risks well

Re: Effects of very large message_size_limit?

2016-09-15 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 15.09.2016 um 07:19 schrieb mro...@insiberia.net: > Hi, I'm wondering what the downside of setting a large > message_size_limit are? > > By "large" I mean 30MB, 40MB, 50MB > > I think sendmail has a default of no restriction for message size - that > seems crazy, but maybe I don't understand

Effects of very large message_size_limit?

2016-09-14 Thread mrobti
Hi, I'm wondering what the downside of setting a large message_size_limit are? By "large" I mean 30MB, 40MB, 50MB I think sendmail has a default of no restriction for message size - that seems crazy, but maybe I don't understand the risks well enough.