It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes to
show how good Postfiix is when it can run for years with so few
problems). Our company has decided to start using an outside SPAM
filtering service. Overall, this is doing a very good job. But we are
getting SPAM directly
On 11/2/2011 10:43 AM, Keith Steensma wrote:
It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes
to show how good Postfiix is when it can run for years with so few
problems). Our company has decided to start using an outside SPAM
filtering service. Overall, this is doing a very
On 2011-11-02 11:43 AM, Keith Steensma ke...@airways-consulting.com wrote:
It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes to
show how good Postfiix is when it can run for years with so few
problems). Our company has decided to start using an outside SPAM
filtering service.
Am 02.11.2011 16:43, schrieb Keith Steensma:
It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes to show
how good Postfiix is when it can run for
years with so few problems). Our company has decided to start using an
outside SPAM filtering service. Overall,
this is doing a
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 10:43:35 Keith Steensma wrote:
It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes
to show how good Postfiix is when it can run for years with so few
problems). Our company has decided to start using an outside SPAM
filtering service. Overall, this
The original message from the company said 'It's a block of 8 Class C
networks'. I (just) read things wrong. And said (to myself), 'self',
that's 8 ip's, right, right! (Dumb!!) Thanks to all.
Keith
On 11/2/2011 11:00 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 10:43:35 Keith
