Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > Presumably it's my fault but I cannot find such an option. If so - thank
> > you for directing me to it. I'm wondering if it possible to limit
> > incoming mail with '...@somedomain.tld' specified as a
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> Presumably it's my fault but I cannot find such an option. If so - thank
> you for directing me to it. I'm wondering if it possible to limit
> incoming mail with '...@somedomain.tld' specified as a sender address*)
> to IPs
On 7 Feb 2021, at 14:33, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
:-)
On 2/7/21 7:51 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 7 Feb 2021, at 12:52, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
:-)
On 2/7/21 6:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-07 18:28, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
Mail from 192.168.3/24 with sender's address 'sth3.tld' should
:-)
On 2/7/21 7:51 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 7 Feb 2021, at 12:52, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
:-)
On 2/7/21 6:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-07 18:28, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
Mail from 192.168.3/24 with sender's address 'sth3.tld' should be
accepted even if the user is not
On 7 Feb 2021, at 12:52, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
:-)
On 2/7/21 6:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-07 18:28, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
Mail from 192.168.3/24 with sender's address 'sth3.tld' should be
accepted even if the user is not authenticated, and rejected without
authentication for
:-)
On 2/7/21 6:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-07 18:28, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
Mail from 192.168.3/24 with sender's address 'sth3.tld' should be
accepted even if the user is not authenticated, and rejected without
authentication for other CIDR blocks.
add 192.168.0.0/16 to
On 2021-02-07 18:28, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
Mail from 192.168.3/24 with sender's address 'sth3.tld' should be
accepted even if the user is not authenticated, and rejected without
authentication for other CIDR blocks.
add 192.168.0.0/16 to mynetworks
you show bogus logs btw
On 2021-02-07 18:08, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I would suggest giving higher preference to SPF. You can even reject
if SPF fails.
sure spf is the network policy, but i do not need network policy to
reject local domains in port 25
world would be perfect if spf was used more even on postfix
:-)
No, misunderstanding. I'm not asking about SPF, DKIM etc.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unauth_destination,
...
I have a mail server for a few domains. I need something more general
that
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 2021-02-07 17:33, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
>> :-)
>
> +1
>
>> Presumably it's my fault but I cannot find such an option. If so -
>> thank you for directing me to it. I'm wondering if it possible to
>> limit
On 2021-02-07 17:33, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
:-)
+1
Presumably it's my fault but I cannot find such an option. If so -
thank you for directing me to it. I'm wondering if it possible to
limit incoming mail with '...@somedomain.tld' specified as a sender
address*) to IPs belonging from some
:-)
Presumably it's my fault but I cannot find such an option. If so - thank
you for directing me to it. I'm wondering if it possible to limit
incoming mail with '...@somedomain.tld' specified as a sender address*)
to IPs belonging from some CIDR ranges:
- if addresses from the ranges belong
12 matches
Mail list logo