Re: Mail from cron delay

2010-01-16 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 06:14:45PM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > > The pre-active delay is measured from the time message is created until > > it enters the active queue (in this case for the first time). So the > > message was either: > > > > - Not yet fully formed (delayed EOF in the > >

Re: Mail from cron delay

2010-01-16 Thread Emmett Culley
On 12/10/2009 11:37 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:12:36AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > It seems like understanding where the "delay=86457" and "delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18" come from would probably help me to understand the 24 delay. >>> >>> Not really. The m

Re: Mail from cron delay

2009-12-10 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:12:36AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > >> It seems like understanding where the "delay=86457" > >> and "delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18" come from would probably help me to > >> understand the 24 delay. > > > > Not really. The message took 1 day to enter the active queue, not >

Re: Mail from cron delay

2009-12-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Emmett Culley: > snip email header > Received: from den1.thisserver.net (den1.thisserver.net [198.202.202.21]) > by g1.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3586C400032 > for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:15:59 -0800 (PST) > Received: by den1.thisserver.net (Postfix, from userid 0) >

Re: Mail from cron delay

2009-12-10 Thread Emmett Culley
On 11/30/2009 10:48 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:35:02AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > >> It seems like understanding where the "delay=86457" >> and "delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18" come from would probably help me to >> understand the 24 delay. > > Not really. The message t

Re: Mail from cron delay

2009-11-30 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:35:02AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > It seems like understanding where the "delay=86457" > and "delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18" come from would probably help me to > understand the 24 delay. Not really. The message took 1 day to enter the active queue, not surprising, since

Re: Mail from cron delay

2009-11-30 Thread Emmett Culley
On 11/29/2009 03:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Emmett Culley: >> For some months I've been noticing on multiple servers that mail >> from a cron job defined in the root's crontab takes 24 hours to >> get to it's destination. It finally bugged me enough to have me >> take a look for the reason. Th

Re: Mail from cron delay

2009-11-30 Thread Wietse Venema
Victor Duchovni: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > > > For some months I've been noticing on multiple servers that mail from a > > cron job defined in the root's crontab takes 24 hours to get to it's > > destination. It finally bugged me enough to have me take a

Re: Mail from cron delay

2009-11-30 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > For some months I've been noticing on multiple servers that mail from a cron > job defined in the root's crontab takes 24 hours to get to it's destination. > It finally bugged me enough to have me take a look for the reason. This

Re: Mail from cron delay

2009-11-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Emmett Culley: > For some months I've been noticing on multiple servers that mail > from a cron job defined in the root's crontab takes 24 hours to > get to it's destination. It finally bugged me enough to have me > take a look for the reason. This is what I found in the maillog > for each day: >

Mail from cron delay

2009-11-29 Thread Emmett Culley
For some months I've been noticing on multiple servers that mail from a cron job defined in the root's crontab takes 24 hours to get to it's destination. It finally bugged me enough to have me take a look for the reason. This is what I found in the maillog for each day: Nov 29 03:15:58 den1 p