Re: Mails rejected due to SPF?

Am 01.06.2016 um 13:41 schrieb Wietse Venema: Admin Beckspaced: i had a similar issue a while back ago when switching to new servers. the new servers supported the IPv6 protocol and as far as i remember IPv6 is always preferred before IPv4. my problem was a missing IP reverse DNS entry for the

Re: Mails rejected due to SPF?

Admin Beckspaced: > i had a similar issue a while back ago when switching to new servers. > the new servers supported the IPv6 protocol and as far as i remember > IPv6 is always preferred before IPv4. > my problem was a missing IP reverse DNS entry for the IPv6 address of my > server. i had an

Re: Mails rejected due to SPF?

Am 31.05.2016 um 21:03 schrieb A. Schulze: Am 31.05.2016 um 19:09 schrieb Johannes Bauer: Hello list, I know this is a bit off-topic, but I'm not sure if I misconfigured Postfix to result in this: Just today, an email of mine was rejected due to SPF reasons: host

Re: Mails rejected due to SPF?

Am 31.05.2016 um 19:09 schrieb Johannes Bauer: Hello list, I know this is a bit off-topic, but I'm not sure if I misconfigured Postfix to result in this: Just today, an email of mine was rejected due to SPF reasons: host mx-ha03.web.de[212.227.15.17] said: 550-Requested action not taken:

Re: Mails rejected due to SPF?

I too face this problem, though all rejected mail comes back from gmail accounts. Something to do with spf and ipv6, I'm still trying to track down the problem. Robert - From my iPhone. > On 31 May 2016, at 6:09 pm, Johannes Bauer wrote: > > Hello list, > > I

Mails rejected due to SPF?

Hello list, I know this is a bit off-topic, but I'm not sure if I misconfigured Postfix to result in this: Just today, an email of mine was rejected due to SPF reasons: host mx-ha03.web.de[212.227.15.17] said: 550-Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable 550-Reject due to SPF policy.