Paul Cocker wrote:
==
#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use File::Copy;
my $valid_recpts = "/home/exchange/virtual.txt"; # original
file from exchange my $relay_recps =
"/home/exchange/relay_recipients"; # final file that will be
postmapped my $dos2unix = `/usr/bi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cocker
> Sent: 23 October 2008 10:29
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25,
> virtual.db missing
>
> > ===
> ==
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> use warnings;
> use strict;
> use File::Copy;
>
> my $valid_recpts = "/home/exchange/virtual.txt"; # original
> file from exchange my $relay_recps =
> "/home/exchange/relay_recipients"; # final file that will be
> postmapped my $dos2unix = `/usr/b
Natxo Asenjo wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Paul Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I assume from your example that I need to insert an OK at the end of
each line, but the documentation
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relay_recipient_maps seems to
suggest I just need a list of ad
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Paul Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume from your example that I need to insert an OK at the end of
> each line, but the documentation
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relay_recipient_maps seems to
> suggest I just need a list of addresses.
it's
Paul Cocker wrote:
>>
>> Postfix expects this format:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
>> ^ -> this is a tab
>>
>
> Thanks for the pointers. I've now set something up, but being more
> comfortable in Windows I've set it all up on that side:
>
> =
> -Original Message-
> From: Natxo Asenjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 October 2008 15:54
> To: Paul Cocker
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25,
> virtual.db missing
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss
> Sent: 08 October 2008 16:10
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet
> to port 25, virtual.db missing
> Importan
Paul Cocker wrote:
But isn't recipient maps purely checking the destination address to see
if it's valid? If so, why does it matter when you check the validity so
long as you do before it reaches its final destination for that domain
and is bounced?
if your secondary accepts a message to an in
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Natxo Asenjo
> Sent: 08 October 2008 14:52
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet
> to port 25, virtual.db missing
>
> On Wed, O
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Paul Cocker wrote:
But isn't recipient maps purely checking the destination address to see
if it's valid? If so, why does it matter when you check the validity so
long as you do before it reaches its final destination for that domain
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Paul Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But isn't recipient maps purely checking the destination address to see
> if it's valid? If so, why does it matter when you check the validity so
> long as you do before it reaches its final destination for that domain
> and
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Paul Cocker wrote:
But isn't recipient maps purely checking the destination address to see
if it's valid? If so, why does it matter when you check the validity so
long as you do before it reaches its final destination for that domain
and is bounced?
Let's just assume your s
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss
> Sent: 08 October 2008 14:03
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet to
> port 25, virtual.db missing
> Importance: Lo
Paul Cocker wrote:
Referring to the uppercase, I assume this is based around both machines
passing directly to the internal server. If, as we do, the secondary
forwards the mail onto the primary (which skips the secondary's headers
and examines those that came before) then such validation is not
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss
> Sent: 08 October 2008 09:04
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25,
> virtual.db missing
>
> Paul Cocker wrote
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cocker
> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2008 6:00 PM
> > To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Subject: RE: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet
Paul Cocker wrote:
The primary passes to an internal mail server, but performs recipient
validation before doing so. This is why I don't believe it's worth doing
on the secondary because it means genuine recipients will be checked
with the internal server twice (should they be received by the
sec
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cocker
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2008 6:00 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet
> to port 25, virtual.db mis
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss
Sent: 07 October 2008 20:01
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25,
virtual.db missing
Importance: Low
Paul Cocker wrote:
> This server is only the secondary mail server for incoming mail,
Paul Cocker wrote:
This server is only the secondary mail server for incoming mail, so it
won't be bouncing anything just passing it onto the primary server which
does perform valid recipient checks.
and the primary will bounce! This is backscatter.
Recipient validation must be performed at th
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Paul Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This server is only the secondary mail server for incoming mail, so it
> won't be bouncing anything just passing it onto the primary server which
> does perform valid recipient checks. I don't see any point doing it here
> too
t
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Evans -
Postfix List
Sent: 06 October 2008 15:46
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db
missing
Paul Cocker wrote:
> I have a CentOS 5.2 m
Paul Cocker wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications. I've compiled virtual and progress is being made.
As we receive around 100 000 mails a day, I assume that doesn't fall into the category of
"low volume", so I don't think reject_unverified_recipient would be suitable,
nor is maintaining a list
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:24:38AM +0100, Paul Cocker wrote:
>
> So at this point I'll see to setup a method for queering AD, and I see the
> HOWTO section has a couple of articles which cover this. My only concern
> would be the risks in opening up communications to AD from the DMZ.
Simply creat
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss
Sent: 06 October 2008 16:30
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: {Spam?} Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db
missing
Paul Cocker a écrit :
> I have a CentOS 5.2 machine running
Paul Cocker a écrit :
> I have a CentOS 5.2 machine running postfix 2.3.3 install via yum and am
> setting up for the first time, having been a sendmail user previously.
>
> I have been configuring it based around 'Postfix email firewall/gateway'
> setup in the postfix documentation as this machi
Paul Cocker wrote:
> I have a CentOS 5.2 machine running postfix 2.3.3 install via yum and am
> setting up for the first time, having been a sendmail user previously.
>
> I have been configuring it based around 'Postfix email firewall/gateway'
> setup in the postfix documentation as this machine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Create the file with:
postmap /etc/postfix/virtual
then attempt to start postfix again. The use of a Makefile in
/etc/postfix is also advised, it'll help keep you sane.
http://www.anchor.com.au/hosting/dedicated/postfix_makefile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNAT
I have a CentOS 5.2 machine running postfix 2.3.3 install via yum and am
setting up for the first time, having been a sendmail user previously.
I have been configuring it based around 'Postfix email firewall/gateway'
setup in the postfix documentation as this machine will be acting as the
primary
30 matches
Mail list logo
