On Friday 22 May 2009 01:38:30 am Steve wrote:
[snip]
The real question I guess I am asking - is it possible to have three
instances of Postfix running on the same box, listening on different
ports, with separate queue directories? Actually, it would be more
accurate to ask HOW someone would
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:12:12AM +0100, Steve wrote:
This is really lame rate control mechanism. It fails catastrophically
when a legitimate site has a spike of email in your direction. Consider
generous connection concurrency limits, and avoid rate limits unless
they are very generous,
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
This 'BSMTP' munged MTA looks to offer very little more than Postfix
save for some Rate Control/Throttling/Better logging ? From my early
explorations with Postfix, it can mostly do all of this anyway or am I
missing something?
Postfix does rate
Quoting Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 18:06 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
2009/5/22 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
2. Rate/Anti DNS control
a. If IP X is seen more than 50 times in 30 minutes block it.
Postfix can do that using anvil
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 03:23:07PM +0100, Steve wrote:
The appliance I took apart had a nice rate control feature. The crux of
it was the ability to set connection limit on a per IP basis in 30
minutes. You could *NOT* change this time window, but could change the
limit thus;
50
I was taking apart a well know anti spam appliance on the Bench today
and it has some interesting (but clearly ripped off) software inside.
I managed to find;
INBOUND MTA
{own munged MTA with a queue structure just like Postfix called BSMTP}
This pushes inbound mail VIA
Steve:
The real question I guess I am asking - is it possible to have three
instances of Postfix running on the same box, listening on different
ports, with separate queue directories? Actually, it would be more
accurate to ask HOW someone would implement this and what benefits it
could give
2009/5/22 Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
This 'BSMTP' munged MTA looks to offer very little more than Postfix
save for some Rate Control/Throttling/Better logging ? From my early
explorations with Postfix, it can mostly do all of this anyway or am I
missing something?
We've also
